Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #4611 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-08-31 13:12 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-09-01 03:33 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
71 TiB DIY NAS Based on ZFS on Linux Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-31 13:12 +0000
Re: 71 TiB DIY NAS Based on ZFS on Linux RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-31 16:58 +0000
Re: 71 TiB DIY NAS Based on ZFS on Linux Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-31 18:49 +0000
Re: 71 TiB DIY NAS Based on ZFS on Linux scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-09-01 03:33 +0000
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-31 13:12 +0000 |
| Subject | 71 TiB DIY NAS Based on ZFS on Linux |
| Message-ID | <2k5224/48ctg5lfVtZAf/LhW@dont-email.me> |
http://louwrentius.com/74tb-diy-nas-based-on-zfs-on-linux.html This is my new 71 TiB DIY NAS. This server is the successor to my six year old, twenty drive 18 TB NAS (17 TiB). With a storage capacity four times higher than the original and an incredible read (2.5 GB/s)/write (1.9 GB/s) performance, it's a worthy successor. ...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-31 16:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ltvk7e$dfb$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4611 |
On 2014-08-31, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > http://louwrentius.com/74tb-diy-nas-based-on-zfs-on-linux.html > > This is my new 71 TiB DIY NAS. This server is the successor to my six > year old, twenty drive 18 TB NAS (17 TiB). With a storage capacity four > times higher than the original and an incredible read (2.5 GB/s)/write > (1.9 GB/s) performance, it's a worthy successor. > > ... Holy crap. I'm at 4TB on a ZFS system, and I already feel like I'm living in the lap of luxury. What would I do with 71 TB? I'm at less than 10% on my current system? (Kidding: bytes are like suitcases; your stuff expands to fill the available space).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-31 18:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ltvqnv$b30$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4613 |
RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > On 2014-08-31, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > > http://louwrentius.com/74tb-diy-nas-based-on-zfs-on-linux.html > > > > This is my new 71 TiB DIY NAS. This server is the successor to > > my six year old, twenty drive 18 TB NAS (17 TiB). With a storage > > capacity four times higher than the original and an incredible > > read (2.5 GB/s)/write (1.9 GB/s) performance, it's a worthy > > successor. > > > > ... > Holy crap. I'm at 4TB on a ZFS system, and I already feel like I'm > living in the lap of luxury. What would I do with 71 TB? I'm at > less than 10% on my current system? (Kidding: bytes are like > suitcases; your stuff expands to fill the available space). Similar here. 3.64TB total on a three drive Raid5 array, although I'm running lvm, mdadm and ext4 on it. Out of the 3.64TB only 1.89TB is actually in use, and of that, 1.49TB is the space allocated to the DVR at the moment. The only way I see him needing 71TB is if he is his own video studio, and he's got hours of raw 2k or 4k footage stored in the array.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-01 03:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lu0peo$i5k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4613 |
In article <ltvk7e$dfb$1@solani.org>, RS Wood <randy@therandymon.com> wrote: >On 2014-08-31, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >> http://louwrentius.com/74tb-diy-nas-based-on-zfs-on-linux.html >> >> This is my new 71 TiB DIY NAS. This server is the successor to my six >> year old, twenty drive 18 TB NAS (17 TiB). With a storage capacity four >> times higher than the original and an incredible read (2.5 GB/s)/write >> (1.9 GB/s) performance, it's a worthy successor. >> >> ... > >Holy crap. I'm at 4TB on a ZFS system, and I already feel like I'm >living in the lap of luxury. What would I do with 71 TB? I'm at less >than 10% on my current system? (Kidding: bytes are like suitcases; your >stuff expands to fill the available space). I have 7.5 TB on tap, using Greyhole. It runs pretty well on modest hardware (host system is an AMD A4-3300 with 4 GB of RAM), allows use of different disk sizes (currently two 3 TB drives and one 1.5 TB drive), and allows selective redundancy by optionally keeping multiple copies of a file on different drives. I use no redundancy for video and music as those files get backed up to BD-R stored offsite. Documents, photos, and the Subversion repository get two copies of everything stored as their contents would be harder to replace if lost (photos get backed up to BD-R, while documents are backed up at Tarsnap). If a drive craps out (it's already happened more than once), files that were stored with redundancy are copied again to one of the good drives. _/_ / v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail) (IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting! \_^_/ >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web