Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #2098 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-03-28 08:45 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-03-28 13:53 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Nvidia's Denver core: problems RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-28 08:45 +0000
Re: Nvidia's Denver core: problems invis <invis@invis.net> - 2014-03-28 11:29 +0000
Re: Nvidia's Denver core: problems RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-28 13:53 +0000
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 08:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Nvidia's Denver core: problems |
| Message-ID | <lh3cs2$r06$1@solani.org> |
From the «I thought the core of Denver was nuclear» department: Title: Denver details make Nvidia’s explanations tenuous Author: Charlie Demerjian Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:00:39 -0400 Link: http://semiaccurate.com/2014/03/27/denver-details-make-nvidias-explanations-tenuous/ With Nvidia damage control in full swing, lets take a look at why the Denver core is having problems. Read more▶[1] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [image 3][2] The post Denver details make Nvidia’s explanations tenuous[1] appeared first on SemiAccurate[4]. Links: [1]: http://semiaccurate.com/2014/03/27/denver-details-make-nvidias-explanations-tenuous/ (link) [2]: http://www.semiaccurate.com/openx/www/delivery/ck.php?n=acee2886cb=1655168573 (link) [3]: http://www.semiaccurate.com/openx/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=6cb=1067634652&n=acee2886 (image) [4]: http://semiaccurate.com (link)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | invis <invis@invis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 11:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lh3mee$3uv$1@invis.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2098 |
On 28/03/2014 08:45, RS Wood wrote: > From the «I thought the core of Denver was nuclear» department: > Title: Denver details make Nvidia’s explanations tenuous > Author: Charlie Demerjian > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:00:39 -0400 > Link: http://semiaccurate.com/2014/03/27/denver-details-make-nvidias-explanations-tenuous/ Unfortunately you need a paid subscription to read TFA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 13:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lh3usf$qnm$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #2105 |
On 2014-03-28, invis <invis@invis.net> wrote: > On 28/03/2014 08:45, RS Wood wrote: > > Unfortunately you need a paid subscription to read TFA. > You're absolutely right. I just nuked them from my RSS reader. Paid subscriptions might work (*might*) if you're big like the New York Times. If you're just some blog, it's a death sentence.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web