Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #1656 > unrolled thread

A licence to waste (taxpayers) money

Started byHils <hils@saynotospam.net>
First post2014-03-16 07:58 +0000
Last post2014-03-17 11:18 +0000
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.misc


Contents

  A licence to waste (taxpayers) money Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-03-16 07:58 +0000
    Re:A licence to waste (taxpayers) money RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-16 17:53 +0000
      Re:A licence to waste (taxpayers) money Biggles <news@packaging.the-shillings.net> - 2014-03-17 00:14 +0000
        Re: A licence to waste (taxpayers) money Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-17 09:52 +0000
        Re: A licence to waste (taxpayers) money Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-03-17 11:18 +0000

#1656 — A licence to waste (taxpayers) money

FromHils <hils@saynotospam.net>
Date2014-03-16 07:58 +0000
SubjectA licence to waste (taxpayers) money
Message-ID<lg3lib$gau$1@speranza.aioe.org>
"The [UK] Ministry of Defence wasted nearly £50m on a cancelled
cryptographic system to protect top-secret military information from the
growing threat of cyber attack. [...]

The Cipher project, run by the French electronics giant Thales, was axed
last year after the forecast budget for assessment costs alone more than
trebled from £19m to £66m. The MoD has now admitted, however, that it
had already spent £46m before ministers finally accepted that Cipher
would neither provide the comprehensive cyber security needed nor prove
value for money."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/another-day-another-government-it-cockup-as-minister-admits-writing-off-mods-46m-antihacking-system-9194817.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1686

FromRS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
Date2014-03-16 17:53 +0000
Message-ID<lg4oe2$d9$1@solani.org>
In reply to#1656
  ministers finally accepted that Cipher
> would neither provide the comprehensive cyber security needed nor prove
> value for money."

> 


As an American this warms my heart. I thought only my government
 was able to waste money like this.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1694

FromBiggles <news@packaging.the-shillings.net>
Date2014-03-17 00:14 +0000
Message-ID<lg5epo$fu0$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1686
 RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> Wrote in message:
>   ministers finally accepted that Cipher
>> would neither provide the comprehensive cyber security needed nor prove
>> value for money."
> 
>> 
> 
> 
> As an American this warms my heart. I thought only my government
>  was able to waste money like this.
> 

That's probably where we got the idea from!
Biggles
-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1705

FromTim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date2014-03-17 09:52 +0000
Message-ID<170320140952072844%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to#1694
In article <lg5epo$fu0$1@dont-email.me>, Biggles
<news@packaging.the-shillings.net> wrote:

> That's probably where we got the idea from!
> Biggles
> -- 


Dear oh dear Biggles!

You're supposed to put the .sig info *after* the separator, not before.

-- 
"If you're not able to ask questions and deal with the answers without feeling 
that someone has called your intelligence or competence into question, don't 
ask questions on Usenet where the answers won't be carefully tailored to avoid
tripping your hair-trigger insecurities."                  - D M Procida, UCSM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1714

FromHils <hils@saynotospam.net>
Date2014-03-17 11:18 +0000
Message-ID<lg6lmn$ibm$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#1694
On 2014-03-17 00:14, Biggles wrote:
> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> Wrote in message:
>>> ministers finally accepted that Cipher would neither provide the
>>> comprehensive cyber security needed nor prove value for money."
>> 
>> As an American this warms my heart. I thought only my government 
>> was able to waste money like this.
> 
> That's probably where we got the idea from!

There's a common culture: a largely hereditary, unaccountable ruling
class which can pass the costs of its f*ckups to taxpayers, consumers
and workers.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.misc


csiph-web