Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | cykros@devio.us |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-14 19:30 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-02-16 15:26 +0100 |
| Articles | 7 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits cykros@devio.us - 2014-02-14 19:30 +0000
Re: Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits cykros@devio.us - 2014-02-14 19:33 +0000
Re: Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 14:59 -0800
Re: Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com - 2014-02-14 19:43 -0800
Re: Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits Atom Cogswell <m8r-uu8mmb@mailinator.com> - 2014-02-15 11:17 -0700
Re: Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-15 20:32 +0000
It's not like Slashdot here :-( "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-16 15:26 +0100
| From | cykros@devio.us |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-14 19:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Laser network between NYSE and Nasdaq will allow more HFT profits |
| Message-ID | <ldlqt8$7c7$2@dont-email.me> |
cykros writes: High Frequency Trading (HFT) is getting an upgrade, as Anova, a company specializing in low latency networks, is on course to finish a new high speed laser network between the NYSE and NASDAQ. Improvements over existing microwave networks expected to be a matter of nanoseconds, which nonetheless will spell major profits for HFT firms. HFT has receive a large amount of criticism due to it being seen as generally adding volatility to the market while not adding anything of value. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/176551-new-laser-network-between-nyse-and-nasdaq-will-allow-high-frequency-traders-to-make-even-more-money
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cykros@devio.us |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-14 19:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ldlr2q$7c7$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #424 |
cykros@devio.us wrote: > cykros writes: High Frequency Trading (HFT) is getting an upgrade, > as Anova, a company specializing in low latency networks, is on > course to finish a new high speed laser network between the NYSE > and NASDAQ. Improvements over existing microwave networks expected > to be a matter of nanoseconds, which nonetheless will spell major > profits for HFT firms. HFT has receive a large amount of criticism > due to it being seen as generally adding volatility to the market > while not adding anything of value. > > http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/176551-new-laser-network-between-nyse-and-nasdaq-will-allow-high-frequency-traders-to-make-even-more-money So, following up to your own article may be poor form, but I didn't want to editorialize the summary, so I saved it for the followup. Generally, this is probably a bad thing when it comes to the stock market application it's getting, but it'd be interesting to see what other applications this laser networking technology may be able to be used in after being pioneered by Wall St. I'm particularly curious, though, as to how susceptible it is to being interrupted, or even tampered with. Seems to me with a hobbyist UAV, depending on where exactly the laser is going, some pretty costly disturbances could be caused...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-14 14:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cd481c0e-72cd-4a26-a230-4cd184ccf43c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425 |
On Friday, February 14, 2014 2:33:46 PM UTC-5, cyk...@devio.us wrote: > Seems to me with a hobbyist UAV, depending on where exactly the laser is going, some pretty costly disturbances could be caused... As someone that enjoys flying hobbyist UAVs (both planes and multirotors), I had a similar thought... but I can also imagine many other things that could be a problem. I actually read the article, and while it mentions "adaptive optics" that make the system tolerant of weather conditions, I have to wonder how it would handle really heavy weather (heavy rain, snow, fog, etc). And what about more momentary interruptions, like birds, bats, balloons... The hobbyist UAV may well be the worst potential blockage, though. A competently stabilized hexa- or octo-copter with position and altitude lock could hover in position for a considerable amount of time. It wouldn't cost that much ($1000) to build or buy a system capable of doing this reliably, and that includes long range control, real-time video, autopilot with waypoint programming, GPS/barometer/compass, etc. ... not that I'd ever do it, hahaha. (Rubbing hands together supervillain-style.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-14 19:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5b1c6369-caa9-4b38-b1bf-6678ac6d4cee@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #429 |
If I were building that, it would be bonded to the existing microwave system, so any interruption would cause it to fail back to the microwave, which is nanoseconds slower. I also take issue with the politically palatable assertion that hft or arbitrage in general CAUSES volatility. It seems to that it detects short wavelength volatility and by absorbing that volatility in the form of profit , it removes the volatility from the market. This is much like a low-pass filter inductor , which warms up, taking energy from the voltage swings, and in the prices process removing those voltage swings from the system. Of course, IF a HFT trader held a significant percentage of the stock in a small company, and IF they sold it all at once, that would cause volatility (much like the flyback voltage from the inductor), but that's a very rare case indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Atom Cogswell <m8r-uu8mmb@mailinator.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-15 11:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ldob1f$vq6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #430 |
On 2/14/2014 8:43 PM, deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com wrote: > If I were building that, it would be bonded to the existing microwave system, so any interruption would cause it to fail back to the microwave, which is nanoseconds slower. So... Quadracopters with chaff canisters then? My point of view: HFT provides liquidity. That's a good thing, since each buyer must find a seller, and the other way around. The side effect of liquidity is volatility. That's going to be unavoidable. The 'service' of providing liquidity is worth something to traders in a general sense, since trades can be made quickly, but the value proposition is this: They're basically playing a latency game with fast networks and finely tuned algorithms, and siphoning heaps of wealth away in the process, without providing any measure of productivity. I don't see sustainability in this practice. Following the low pass filter analogy, what happens when these firms decide they aren't happy with the profit, and they turn up the knob?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-15 20:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ldoisf$p7i$5@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #424 |
On 2014-02-14, cykros@devio.us <cykros@devio.us> wrote: > cykros writes: High Frequency Trading (HFT) is getting an upgrade, as > Anova, a company specializing in low latency networks, is on course to > finish a new high speed laser network between the NYSE and NASDAQ. > Improvements over existing microwave networks expected to be a matter > of nanoseconds, which nonetheless will spell major profits for HFT > firms. HFT has receive a large amount of criticism due to it being > seen as generally adding volatility to the market while not adding > anything of value. > I am attracted intellectually by the idea of a low latency network built over laser. But the idea that this technology is going to be used to further the existence of a practice that has at least once threatened to bring the economy of the Western world to its knees sickens me. A lot of people are saying HFT should be shut the hell down immediately, and I'm one of them. How about if we hack the network and use the laser to fry this bad idea? (I'm reminded of that old 80s movie Real Genius where they divert the laser to cook a big bag of popcorn).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-16 15:26 +0100 |
| Subject | It's not like Slashdot here :-( |
| Message-ID | <6eu6ta-0dl.ln1@7398004cd8ad880124144d3c685567d7.anonymous> |
| In reply to | #424 |
On 2014-02-14, cykros@devio.us <cykros@devio.us> wrote: > cykros writes: High Frequency Trading (HFT) is getting an upgrade, > as Anova, a company specializing in low latency networks, is on > course to finish a new high speed laser network between the NYSE > and NASDAQ. An article mentioning lasers and sharks (sort of), and still no comment about sharks wearing head-mounted lasers :-( -- Trolling is a art! My public-key is available on http://tinyurl.com/ps9r99y
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web