Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #439 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-15 11:21 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-02-21 17:21 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Leafnode is great Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Leafnode is great RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-15 19:59 +0000
Re: Leafnode is great "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-16 00:18 +0000
Re: Leafnode is great Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-02-21 17:21 +0000
| From | Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-15 11:21 -0800 |
| Subject | Leafnode is great |
| Message-ID | <gbr4ta-k1r.ln1@quartz.orner.dyndns.org> |
Whoever suggested Leafnode, in conjunction with my favorite reader slrn, is wonderful. I have used slrnpull over the years, but Leafnode has such a simple, almost non-existent interface, where it will automatically start pulling groups when your reader requests them, it is genius. And, it makes reading news _so_ much snappier. -- Lance Orner (lance@orner.net)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-15 19:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ldoguh$p7i$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #439 |
On 2014-02-15, Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> wrote: > Whoever suggested Leafnode, in conjunction with my favorite reader > slrn, is wonderful. I have used slrnpull over the years, but Leafnode > has such a simple, almost non-existent interface, where it will > automatically start pulling groups when your reader requests them, it > is genius. And, it makes reading news _so_ much snappier. > I use it too, and agree. I also use it to keep a local archive of posts. In the same vein, but for IMAP mail connections, is offlineimap, which clones your IMAP "repository" locally. Anything you do to the local repository gets transmitted back up to your server the next time you connect. For example, I will use it before a long train trip to get a local cache of my "sent mail." Then (while off line), weed out stuff I don't care to keep, then sync it next time I connect. The danger is of course one day you decide you don't want to use it anymore, and delete the local cache without first turning off syncing. Guess what happens next time your machine connects? ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-16 00:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <530003f0$0$2911$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #445 |
op 15-02-14 19:59 schreef RS Wood: > On 2014-02-15, Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> wrote: >> Whoever suggested Leafnode, in conjunction with my favorite reader >> slrn, is wonderful. I have used slrnpull over the years, but Leafnode >> has such a simple, almost non-existent interface, where it will >> automatically start pulling groups when your reader requests them, it >> is genius. And, it makes reading news _so_ much snappier. >> > > I use it too, and agree. I also use it to keep a local archive of > posts. In the same vein, but for IMAP mail connections, is offlineimap, > which clones your IMAP "repository" locally. Anything you do to the > local repository gets transmitted back up to your server the next time > you connect. > > For example, I will use it before a long train trip to get a local cache > of my "sent mail." Then (while off line), weed out stuff I don't care > to keep, then sync it next time I connect. > > The danger is of course one day you decide you don't want to use it > anymore, and delete the local cache without first turning off syncing. > Guess what happens next time your machine connects? ... > Hmm, then what's the advantage of IMAP + a local cache vs. good old POP that includes a local copy by default?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-21 17:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlgf2ot.4r2.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #439 |
On 2014-02-15, Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> wrote: > Whoever suggested Leafnode, in conjunction with my favorite reader > slrn, is wonderful. I have used slrnpull over the years, but Leafnode > has such a simple, almost non-existent interface, where it will > automatically start pulling groups when your reader requests them, it > is genius. And, it makes reading news _so_ much snappier. > If you like Leafnode, you'll probably like Leafnode-2 too. I have it running on Arch Linux. <http://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/leafnode/beta/> <https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Leafnode2> -- -- ^^^^^^^^^^ -- Whiskers -- ~~~~~~~~~~
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web