Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #17303 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dario Niedermann <dario@darioniedermann.it> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-21 14:09 +0100 |
| Last post | 2019-01-21 17:03 -0500 |
| Articles | 5 on this page of 25 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Dario Niedermann <dario@darioniedermann.it> - 2019-01-21 14:09 +0100
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-01-21 18:18 +0300
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-21 16:50 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-01-21 20:21 +0300
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-21 17:37 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 10:59 -0800
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-01-22 17:05 +0300
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Ronny Biggs <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 22:59 -0400
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-01-22 23:06 -0500
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Kerry Imming <kcimming@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 12:16 -0600
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:47 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Filip454 <filip454.grupydyskusyjne@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-24 03:38 +0100
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-24 09:52 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Filip454 <filip454.grupydyskusyjne@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-24 03:41 +0100
[OT] overpopulation Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-01-23 04:07 +0000
Re: [OT] overpopulation gage@whereever.com - 2019-01-23 23:48 -0600
Re: [OT] overpopulation gage@whereever.com - 2019-01-24 00:03 -0600
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-23 10:21 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-24 09:50 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-01-23 21:25 +0300
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:45 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-01-23 21:36 -0400
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-24 09:52 +0000
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 20:48 -0800
Re: Surveillance capitalism: the goal is to automate us Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 17:03 -0500
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 18:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <garr23Fk4paU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17317 |
On 2019-01-23, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:59:00 -0400
> Ronny Biggs <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 21/01/2019 18:59, The Real Bev wrote:
>
>> We need to start somewhere to reduce the global population. What is
>> your solution smart chap?
>
> No need to do anything. Eat, drink, and enjoy life. Nature will run its course, as it always does. Then, in gallop the 9 horsemen of the apocalypse [1].
>
>
> [1] hat tip to Huge
[Blush]Thank you.
But 9? Have they been breeding also?
--
Today is Pungenday, the 23rd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3185
~ Stercus accidit ~
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 21:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87ef9296r4.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
| In reply to | #17311 |
Ronny Biggs <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes:
> On 21/01/2019 18:59, The Real Bev wrote:
>>
>> I've hated crowds ever since then and regard overpopulation as one of
>> the greatest sins imaginable.
>
> So what should we do? Should we start culling all the homeless people,
> then all jobless people, then people who are a burden on the society
> such as disabled people and people on welfare, then we should let people
> in disaster zones to die and stop aid agencies to go to their
> assistance. Is this what you are suggesting?
We can just about restore the balance of ecology, the bioshpere and
so on -- in other words we can live within our means instead of an
unpayable overdraft, as we've been doing for the past half century
-- if we exterminate the two hundred million most extravagant and
wasteful of our species.
-- John Brunner, _The Sheep Look Up_, 1972
[See also: _Stand on Zanzibar_ and _Shockwave Rider_, same author.]
> We need to start somewhere to reduce the global population. What is
> your solution smart chap?
Well, nearly 50 years further along, we might have to raise that to
somewhere between 350 and 500 million "most extravagant and wasteful".
--
Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 09:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gatg6aF1rvfU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17320 |
On 2019-01-24, Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:
>
> Ronny Biggs <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes:
>
>> On 21/01/2019 18:59, The Real Bev wrote:
>>>
>>> I've hated crowds ever since then and regard overpopulation as one of
>>> the greatest sins imaginable.
>>
>> So what should we do? Should we start culling all the homeless people,
>> then all jobless people, then people who are a burden on the society
>> such as disabled people and people on welfare, then we should let people
>> in disaster zones to die and stop aid agencies to go to their
>> assistance. Is this what you are suggesting?
>
> We can just about restore the balance of ecology, the bioshpere and
> so on -- in other words we can live within our means instead of an
> unpayable overdraft, as we've been doing for the past half century
> -- if we exterminate the two hundred million most extravagant and
> wasteful of our species.
>
> -- John Brunner, _The Sheep Look Up_, 1972
>
> [See also: _Stand on Zanzibar_ and _Shockwave Rider_, same author.]
Excellent trilogy. SoZ is one of my favourite SF books, ever.
And I suspect it would be rather more than 200,000,000. And there is isn't
room on Zanzibar any more.
>
>> We need to start somewhere to reduce the global population. What is
>> your solution smart chap?
>
> Well, nearly 50 years further along, we might have to raise that to
> somewhere between 350 and 500 million "most extravagant and wasteful".
Precisely.
--
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 24th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3185
~ Stercus accidit ~
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 20:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q2bg2u$313$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #17311 |
On 01/22/2019 06:59 PM, Ronny Biggs wrote:
> On 21/01/2019 18:59, The Real Bev wrote:
>>
>> I've hated crowds ever since then and regard overpopulation as one of
>> the greatest sins imaginable.
>
> So what should we do? Should we start culling all the homeless people,
> then all jobless people, then people who are a burden on the society
> such as disabled people and people on welfare, then we should let people
> in disaster zones to die and stop aid agencies to go to their
> assistance. Is this what you are suggesting? Perhaps we should stir up
> trouble in Africa so that various tribes can kill each other and we
> should provide them with weapons when they run out of theirs.
>
> We need to start somewhere to reduce the global population. What is
> your solution smart chap?
Free contraception on request would be useful. If welfare moms can make
a profit by producing another child, draw the limit at 2. Make legal
immigration difficult and illegal immigration impossible.
Culling is clearly impractical as well as improper. Preventing births,
however, is neither.
Aren't we already selling weapons to African crazies?
--
Cheers, Bev
"My parents just came back from a planet where the dominant lifeform
had no bilateral symmetry, and all I got was this stupid F-Shirt."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 17:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q25fjn$v14$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #17305 |
Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes: > On 2019-01-21, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:09:23 +0100 >> Dario Niedermann <dario@darioniedermann.it> wrote: >> >>> Nice article and interview with prof. Zuboff on surveillance capitalism: >> >>> A couple of extracts: >>> >>> | These processes are meticulously designed to produce ignorance by >>> | circumventing individual awareness and thus eliminate any possibility >>> | of self-determination. As one data scientist explained to me, "We can >>> | engineer the context around a particular behaviour and force change >>> | that way [...] >> >> >> The article brings to mind the fact that essentially every company I do >> business with is eager to convince me to enroll in auto-bill pay >> systems, where they receive their money without the inconvenience of an >> actual consumer verifying the costs, rates, and charges being applied >> for the service. My answer is a consistent "get fucked." I read every >> bill and bitch loudly when it does not correspond to what I was >> expecting. > > And, surprise, surprise, it's always wrong in their favour. If you could prove systematic errors in billing in the companies favor, you'd have a major news story and a great opportunity to sell short. I simply look at my statements to spot things that should not be there. I've got near 100% of my bills on auto-pay and it makes me happy. Now my paper check supply lasts for years. -- Dan Espen
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web