Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #6846 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-02-27 20:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-03-19 01:36 +0000 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage • The Register RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-02-27 20:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage ? The Register Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-02-27 23:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage • The Register Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-02-28 12:00 +1100
Re: Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage • The Register RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-03-18 16:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage ? The Register Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-03-19 01:36 +0000
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-02-27 20:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage • The Register |
| Message-ID | <mcqjj5$t0n$1@solani.org> |
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/26/microsoft_spartan_browser_ rationale/ Love the subtitle: "even Microsoft is fed up with IE rendering quirks. " I think Nadella recognizes the brand name is tarnished. In fact I wouldn't put it past them to take the exact same code base, slap a new icon and name on it, change a bit of the chrome, and announce it to the world as a new browser. When techies point out that it has the same rendering quirks they will claim it was intentional and for compatibility reasons.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-02-27 23:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage ? The Register |
| Message-ID | <mcquba$5ns$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #6846 |
RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/26/microsoft_spartan_browser_ > rationale/ > Love the subtitle: "even Microsoft is fed up with IE rendering > quirks. " I think Nadella recognizes the brand name is > tarnished. > In fact I wouldn't put it past them to take the exact same code > base, slap a new icon and name on it, change a bit of the chrome, > and announce it to the world as a new browser. You mean like they did with Win7? Sadly, for too many of the lemmings, slapping a new icon/look/name on it is sufficient to convince them it is truly different. > When techies point out that it has the same rendering quirks they > will claim it was intentional and for compatibility reasons. Yep...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-02-28 12:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <clci9pFerg4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #6846 |
On 28/02/2015 7:20 AM, RS Wood wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/26/microsoft_spartan_browser_ > rationale/ > > > Love the subtitle: "even Microsoft is fed up with IE rendering > quirks. " I think Nadella recognizes the brand name is > tarnished. > > In fact I wouldn't put it past them to take the exact same code > base, slap a new icon and name on it, change a bit of the > chrome, and announce it to the world as a new browser. When > techies point out that it has the same rendering quirks they will > claim it was intentional and for compatibility reasons. > > The problem for Microsoft is that so many people treat IE as a reference implementation (whether those people realise it or not). A new version will inevitably contain rendering bugs, and unless Microsoft are willing to break sites that depend on those bugs, they'll find themselves in exactly the same situation again in a few years. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-18 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20150318160153.3022088c.rsw@therandymon.com> |
| In reply to | #6846 |
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:20:01 +0000 (WET) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: Here is an update: http://osnews.com/story/28400/Microsoft_is_killing_off_the_Internet_Explorer_brand //--clip Microsoft is killing off the Internet Explorer brand by Thom Holwerda in OSNews at 13:04, Tuesday, 17 March While Microsoft has dropped hints that the Internet Explorer brand is going away, the software maker has now confirmed that it will use a new name for its upcoming browser successor, codenamed Project Spartan. Speaking at Microsoft Convergence yesterday, Microsoft's marketing chief Chris Capossela revealed that the company is currently working on a new name and brand. "We're now researching what the new brand, or the new name, for our browser should be in Windows 10," said Capossela. "We'll continue to have Internet Explorer, but we'll also have a new browser called Project Spartan, which is codenamed Project Spartan. We have to name the thing." The only sensible move. The Internet Explorer name is tainted far, far beyond repair. //--clip -- RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-19 01:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Microsoft man: Internet Explorer had to go because it's garbage ? The Register |
| Message-ID | <med96t$tja$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #7094 |
RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:20:01 +0000 (WET) > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > The Internet Explorer name is tainted far, far beyond repair. Major reality distortion field there. It is the Microsoft name itself that is tainted far, far beyond repair.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web