Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #3042 > unrolled thread

Why online communities decay over time

Started byRS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
First post2014-05-23 20:56 +0000
Last post2014-05-27 09:50 -0700
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.misc


Contents

  Why online communities decay over time RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-23 20:56 +0000
    Re: Why online communities decay over time Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-05-24 15:17 +0100
    Re: Why online communities decay over time RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-27 15:14 +0000
      Re: Why online communities decay over time Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2014-05-27 09:50 -0700

#3042 — Why online communities decay over time

FromRS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
Date2014-05-23 20:56 +0000
SubjectWhy online communities decay over time
Message-ID<lloclg$o1o$1@solani.org>
From the «by all means, do not follow-up to this post» department:
Title: Why Online Communities Decay Over Time
Author:
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:46:20 -0400
Link: http://rs.io/2014/02/26/why-online-communities-decay-over-time.html

Comments[1]

Links:
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7790755 (link)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#3077

FromWhiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com>
Date2014-05-24 15:17 +0100
Message-ID<slrnlo1ag2.29p.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net>
In reply to#3042
On 2014-05-23, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:
> From the «by all means, do not follow-up to this post» department:
> Title: Why Online Communities Decay Over Time
> Author:
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:46:20 -0400
> Link: http://rs.io/2014/02/26/why-online-communities-decay-over-time.html
>
> Comments[1]
>
> Links:
> [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7790755 (link)

Feeling anonymous, and the ability to have multiple identities, also
contribute towards bad behaviour.

Usenet has the advantage, shared with few if any web-based forums, that
each user can choose which other users' contributions to 'hide'; this
cuts down on the amount of annoyance that has to be endured.

-- 
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
--  Whiskers 
-- ~~~~~~~~~~

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#3292

FromRS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
Date2014-05-27 15:14 +0000
Message-ID<20140527151422.9450d545.rsw@therandymon.com>
In reply to#3042
On Fri, 23 May 2014 20:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:

> From the «by all means, do not follow-up to this post» department:
> Title: Why Online Communities Decay Over Time
> Author:
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:46:20 -0400
> Link: http://rs.io/2014/02/26/why-online-communities-decay-over-time.html
> 
> Comments[1]
> 
> Links:
> [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7790755 (link)


Have a look at the comments on HackerNews and you'll see right at the
top, some very flattering commentary about Usenet and how despite its
flaws, most communities using any software have trouble meeting the bar
it set back in its earliest designs.   (link [1] above).

I'm increasingly convinced it's not a software issue, it's that human
beings are by nature antisocial, aggressive, vindictive, petty, and
stupid with limited communication skills: basically, monkeys on
keyboards.  No algorithm or interface is going to change that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#3297

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2014-05-27 09:50 -0700
Message-ID<buju3jFo7coU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#3292
RS Wood wrote:

> human beings are by nature antisocial, aggressive, vindictive, petty,
> and stupid with limited communication skills: basically, monkeys on
> keyboards.

That analysis only explains the bad (decayed?) aspect of usenet.

But it isn't consistent with the halcyon days of many many dynamic 
usenet groups or earlier online communities such as GEnie RoundTables or 
CompuServe forums.

Under 'these' conditions, humans interact (very) badly/poorly.  Under 
'those' conditions, humans interact (very) positively.


-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.misc


csiph-web