Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #2879 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-19 15:44 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-21 13:06 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 200 — 45 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-19 15:47 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-19 21:33 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 10:32 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 11:01 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 11:38 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 12:23 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-21 12:40 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-21 15:59 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 13:16 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-21 18:38 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 13:18 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2014-05-21 13:46 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 21:22 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 15:03 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 15:20 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> - 2014-05-22 21:40 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-22 08:20 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-22 18:14 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-23 07:21 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn pechter@tucker.pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2014-05-21 19:11 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 20:18 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 21:16 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-21 22:19 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-21 23:02 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2014-05-22 05:42 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-22 19:22 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-22 19:26 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-22 17:52 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-22 18:02 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 02:02 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 13:16 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 06:51 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-23 09:35 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 19:55 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2014-05-23 09:49 -0600
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-23 19:24 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2014-05-23 14:23 -0600
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 16:19 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-23 07:32 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 07:09 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 09:36 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 19:00 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 15:21 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 21:58 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-24 00:34 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-24 10:22 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-23 17:35 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-24 10:20 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:41 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-24 00:33 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-24 10:39 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-24 09:28 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-24 13:13 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-24 10:51 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-24 18:50 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-24 20:05 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stan Barr <plan.b@dsl.pipex.com> - 2014-05-24 16:22 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-24 19:30 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-26 09:36 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-26 15:01 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-26 22:02 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-26 19:17 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-26 15:40 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-26 22:14 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-25 22:30 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-26 05:02 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-24 20:34 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-24 13:36 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-24 16:29 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 14:47 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-25 22:43 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-25 17:56 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-26 11:49 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-26 14:18 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-28 17:46 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-28 20:11 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-28 13:29 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-28 19:19 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-29 14:10 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-30 00:42 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-30 05:48 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-29 18:00 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-29 13:17 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-30 15:57 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-30 15:55 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-05-30 20:32 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-31 08:50 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-06-01 10:11 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-06-01 16:07 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-29 18:42 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lawrence Statton <lawrence@perl.mx> - 2014-05-29 14:15 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-29 15:32 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-28 19:13 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-28 14:44 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-28 22:45 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-30 11:10 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2014-05-29 05:48 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:26 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-26 13:06 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-26 12:35 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-28 17:49 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-28 13:06 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "ratty" <ratty@gmail.com> - 2014-05-30 14:16 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-30 04:47 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-30 11:41 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "ratty" <ratty@gmail.com> - 2014-05-30 21:05 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bernd Felsche <berfel@innovative.iinet.net.au> - 2014-05-30 19:16 +0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:02 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-26 18:44 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 21:10 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-26 21:14 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-26 21:45 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 23:59 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 23:44 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-27 11:35 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-26 20:25 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-26 13:38 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-27 13:59 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-06-14 18:05 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Oeter Johns" <oj19854@nospam.com> - 2014-06-15 07:32 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-15 00:50 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-06-15 16:44 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 16:27 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 14:53 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "2ju" <2ju@gmail.com> - 2014-05-25 06:59 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-24 22:44 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-29 13:40 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-29 20:01 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-24 19:01 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-25 00:58 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-25 13:17 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-26 17:08 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-25 10:17 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-22 09:54 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-22 15:56 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-22 14:07 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2014-05-23 12:44 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-21 08:20 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-22 17:58 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-23 00:00 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-22 18:12 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 09:50 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-23 18:37 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 16:59 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 12:08 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-23 12:03 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-23 21:58 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 03:20 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-24 13:11 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:47 -0400
What constitutes being a Yankee? [was Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn] Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2014-05-29 14:58 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 15:59 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2014-05-23 23:41 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 04:09 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:31 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-25 14:34 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bernd Felsche <berfel@innovative.iinet.net.au> - 2014-05-23 16:15 +0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-21 14:15 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-21 14:35 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-21 14:38 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-21 08:22 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-21 15:43 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-22 15:54 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2014-05-21 07:07 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-21 15:23 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-19 23:10 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-19 22:54 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-20 19:52 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-20 23:22 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-20 11:10 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-20 11:56 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-20 12:32 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-20 15:24 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2014-05-21 14:08 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 16:06 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-20 13:50 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Rob Brown <brown@greenslade.gmcl.internal> - 2014-05-20 19:49 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 10:35 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-20 21:11 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-20 13:45 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-21 05:31 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> - 2014-05-21 09:35 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-20 15:14 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Rob Brown <brown@greenslade.gmcl.internal> - 2014-05-20 20:00 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-05-20 16:45 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-20 21:14 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-21 09:42 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 10:33 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2014-05-20 13:40 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-21 09:40 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-21 08:27 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-21 12:11 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 20:52 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2014-05-21 13:06 +0000
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-19 15:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn |
| Message-ID | <20140519154416.487cd031.rsw@therandymon.com> |
Saw this linked at HackerNews: a revamped PDP-11/34 with all sorts of 1970s goodness. Very cool article, and clearly people who appreciate and love the era. http://www.nycresistor.com/2014/05/15/pdp-11/ -- RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-19 15:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20140519154736.4237c20a.rsw@therandymon.com> |
| In reply to | #2879 |
On Mon, 19 May 2014 15:44:16 +0000 RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > Saw this linked at HackerNews: a revamped PDP-11/34 with all sorts of > 1970s goodness. Very cool article, and clearly people who appreciate > and love the era. > > http://www.nycresistor.com/2014/05/15/pdp-11/ > I should've also provided the URL to their photos, which are very compelling. https://www.flickr.com/photos/osr/14043526294/in/set-72157644327706146
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-19 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1801744438422227874.696355peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2880 |
RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2014 15:44:16 +0000 > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > >> Saw this linked at HackerNews: a revamped PDP-11/34 with all sorts of >> 1970s goodness. Very cool article, and clearly people who appreciate >> and love the era. >> >> http://www.nycresistor.com/2014/05/15/pdp-11/ >> > > I should've also provided the URL to their photos, which are very > compelling. > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/osr/14043526294/in/set-72157644327706146 Neat!!! -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 10:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3dmgF8gbeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2880 |
On 2014-05-19, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2014 15:44:16 +0000 > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > >> Saw this linked at HackerNews: a revamped PDP-11/34 with all sorts of >> 1970s goodness. Very cool article, and clearly people who appreciate >> and love the era. >> >> http://www.nycresistor.com/2014/05/15/pdp-11/ >> > > I should've also provided the URL to their photos, which are very > compelling. > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/osr/14043526294/in/set-72157644327706146 Oh, nostalgia, where is thy sting? I spent a number of years jammed into various broom cupboards laughingly referred to as "computer rooms" installing PDP11/34s which were doing process control of crisp (US: chip) bagging machines - we were controlling the weighing process in an attempt to meet the regulatory requirement not to produce underweight bags of crisps while at the same time trying to reduce the "giveaway" (the amount of product over the marked weight) in each bag. The code was written in a mixture of MACRO-11 and RTL/2 and interfaced to the bagging machines using GEC "Media" interfaces which allowed us to read outputs from the weigh cells on the machines and issue commands back to them, such as "make a bag" and "start/stop feeding product into the weigh pan". Far and away the most interesting place I've ever worked in my career. I also worked on systems to weigh ingredients for biscuits (US: cookies), to weigh and count the biscuits themselves (if they're too thin, the packet is underweight, if too thick, the end seal on the pack won't close properly, exposing the end biscuit in the package), I also did stuff to weigh & control the thickness of chocolate coating on biscuits, to weigh and record the amount of waste leaving the factory - a system memorably called "WMPIGS" (after the ultimate fate of the factory waste) and to weigh pallets of finished product leaving the factory. Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. -- Today is Sweetmorn, the 68th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180 "I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 11:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3fbeF1v2cU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2936 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: > Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. Is that why you are Huge? :-) -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 11:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3hhaF8gbeU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2941 |
On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: > >> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. > > Is that why you are Huge? :-) One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given name, I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down to 16.5 at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me for decades. I must admit that working for a crisp & biscuit manufacturer didn't do a whole lot for my weight. I used to sit in my office and watch millions of chocolate digestives go past every day. And you wouldn't believe how nice freshly cooked crisps are. -- Today is Sweetmorn, the 68th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180 "I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 12:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2942 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: > On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >> >>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. >> >> Is that why you are Huge? :-) > > One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given name, > I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down to 16.5 > at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me for > decades. I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. Aiming to lose a bit more now...! -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 12:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3l5jFa8ciU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2944 |
In article <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net>, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> writes: > On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: > >> On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >>> >>>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. >>> >>> Is that why you are Huge? :-) >> >> One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given name, >> I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down to 16.5 >> at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me for >> decades. > > I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 > stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. > Aiming to lose a bit more now...! > How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? Sorry, here it is :-) I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or scrambling for Google to find out just what that means. bill (who, although an American, spent 3 years with BAOR) -- Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves billg999@cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. University of Scranton | Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 15:59 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <87zjibxp6m.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| In reply to | #2946 |
bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon): >>> have been 20 stone in the past > > [...] > How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? > > Sorry, here it is :-) > > I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or > scrambling for Google to find out just what that means. No need to consult Google. In American units, that's almost exactly 992 cups of corn starch. Marko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 13:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3n9pF8gbeU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2947 |
On 2014-05-21, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: > bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon): > >>>> have been 20 stone in the past >> >> [...] >> How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? >> >> Sorry, here it is :-) >> >> I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or >> scrambling for Google to find out just what that means. > > No need to consult Google. In American units, that's almost exactly 992 > cups of corn starch. *applause* -- Today is Sweetmorn, the 68th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180 "I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 18:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <0d1v4b-m301.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #2947 |
On 2014-05-21, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: > bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon): > >>>> have been 20 stone in the past >> >> [...] >> How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? >> >> Sorry, here it is :-) >> >> I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or >> scrambling for Google to find out just what that means. > > No need to consult Google. In American units, that's almost exactly 992 > cups of corn starch. What? One stone or 20 stone is 992 cups of corn starch? :-) -- Paul Sture The final step of #heartbleed recovery is to call your mother, and advise her to change her maiden name -- @gojomo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 13:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3ndcF8gbeU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2946 |
On 2014-05-21, Bill Gunshannon <bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu> wrote: > In article <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net>, > Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> writes: >> On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: >> >>> On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >>>> >>>>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. >>>> >>>> Is that why you are Huge? :-) >>> >>> One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given name, >>> I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down to 16.5 >>> at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me for >>> decades. >> >> I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 >> stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. >> Aiming to lose a bit more now...! >> > > How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? 14 lb. So, when I really *was* "Huge", I was 280lb. > Sorry, here it is :-) > > I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or scrambling > for Google to find out just what that means. Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the fortnight. -- Today is Sweetmorn, the 68th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180 "I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 13:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <537cae49$0$52759$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> |
| In reply to | #2952 |
Huge <usenet@huge.org.uk> wrote:
+---------------
| Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British
| terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the
| fortnight.
+---------------
But of course the Unix "units" program retains both
"stone" and "fortnight". And let us not forget "furlongs"
(660 ft, or 201.168 m), which lets us express the
speed of light in "furlongs per fortnight": ;-}
$ units c furlongs/fortnight
* 1.8026175e+12
/ 5.5474886e-13
$
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue <http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 21:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.xf7773ngo4et73@dell3100> |
| In reply to | #2954 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:46:49 +0100, Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org> wrote: > Huge <usenet@huge.org.uk> wrote: > +--------------- > | Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British > | terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the > | fortnight. > +--------------- > > But of course the Unix "units" program retains both > "stone" and "fortnight". And let us not forget "furlongs" > (660 ft, or 201.168 m), which lets us express the > speed of light in "furlongs per fortnight": ;-} > > $ units c furlongs/fortnight > * 1.8026175e+12 > / 5.5474886e-13 > $ > > > -Rob > Wikipedia knows all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_system > ----- just 2 dashes is normal > Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org> > 627 26th Avenue <http://rpw3.org/> > San Mateo, CA 94403 > -- It's a money /life balance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 15:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3thrF1v2cU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2952 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:18:36 +0000, Huge wrote: > On 2014-05-21, Bill Gunshannon <bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu> wrote: >> In article <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net>, >> Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> writes: >>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: >>> >>>> On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could >>>>>> eat. >>>>> >>>>> Is that why you are Huge? :-) >>>> >>>> One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given >>>> name, I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down >>>> to 16.5 at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me >>>> for decades. >>> >>> I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 >>> stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. >>> Aiming to lose a bit more now...! >>> >>> >> How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? > > 14 lb. So, when I really *was* "Huge", I was 280lb. > >> Sorry, here it is :-) >> >> I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or >> scrambling for Google to find out just what that means. > > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the > fortnight. Apart from, of course, DEC using the microfortnight. -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 15:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu3uhbFcblcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2962 |
On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:18:36 +0000, Huge wrote: > >> On 2014-05-21, Bill Gunshannon <bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu> wrote: >>> In article <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net>, >>> Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> writes: >>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could >>>>>>> eat. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that why you are Huge? :-) >>>>> >>>>> One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given >>>>> name, I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down >>>>> to 16.5 at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me >>>>> for decades. >>>> >>>> I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 >>>> stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. >>>> Aiming to lose a bit more now...! >>>> >>>> >>> How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? >> >> 14 lb. So, when I really *was* "Huge", I was 280lb. >> >>> Sorry, here it is :-) >>> >>> I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or >>> scrambling for Google to find out just what that means. >> >> Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British >> terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the >> fortnight. > > Apart from, of course, DEC using the microfortnight. When one did an RSX11M build, when it got to the point of assembling the kernel, depending on what you'd previously told it the clock frequency was, it told you to go and get a cup of coffee or tea... -- Today is Sweetmorn, the 68th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180 "I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 21:40 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <220520142140103926%nospam@yrl.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #2964 |
In article <bu3uhbFcblcU1@mid.individual.net>, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > When one did an RSX11M build, when it got to the point of assembling > the kernel, depending on what you'd previously told it the clock frequency > was, it told you to go and get a cup of coffee or tea... SET/COFFEEBREAK That was a joke the paled after your 5th attempt to get your sysgen to work right. -- To de-mung my e-mail address:- fsnospam$elliott$$ PGP Fingerprint: 1A96 3CF7 637F 896B C810 E199 7E5C A9E4 8E59 E248
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 08:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <llkc06$8b4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2962 |
In article <bu3thrF1v2cU4@mid.individual.net>, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >Apart from, of course, DEC using the microfortnight. Lets also not forget that there are PI seconds in a nanocentury.. Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 18:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <llm0d7$u96$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2984 |
"Gordon Henderson" <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> wrote in message news:llkc06$8b4$1@dont-email.me... > In article <bu3thrF1v2cU4@mid.individual.net>, > Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: > >>Apart from, of course, DEC using the microfortnight. > > Lets also not forget that there are PI seconds in a nanocentury.. > According to my calculations, there are 3.1556736 seconds in a nanocentury. -- numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 07:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <llmst4$fd9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #3006 |
In article <llm0d7$u96$1@dont-email.me>, Charles Richmond <numerist@aquaporin4.com> wrote: >"Gordon Henderson" <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> wrote in message >news:llkc06$8b4$1@dont-email.me... >> In article <bu3thrF1v2cU4@mid.individual.net>, >> Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >> >>>Apart from, of course, DEC using the microfortnight. >> >> Lets also not forget that there are PI seconds in a nanocentury.. >> > >According to my calculations, there are 3.1556736 seconds in a nanocentury. Who needs more than 1% accuracy.. Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web