Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #71 > unrolled thread

Welcome Slashdot refugees!

Started byOregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com>
First post2014-02-06 22:38 -0800
Last post2014-02-26 17:30 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 102 — 44 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.misc


Contents

  Welcome Slashdot refugees! Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-06 22:38 -0800
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! xyzzy <stalkers-suck@grr.la> - 2014-02-07 00:16 -0800
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! "I'm Batman, Dammit" <batman@thecave.invalid> - 2014-02-07 09:44 +0000
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-09 03:39 +0000
        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-08 22:46 -0500
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-09 23:14 +0000
            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-10 01:55 +0000
              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-09 21:12 -0500
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-09 18:28 -0800
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-09 23:35 -0500
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-10 12:39 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-11 04:05 +0000
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 09:25 -0500
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:11 -0500
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-26 22:20 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:40 -0500
              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 17:14 +0000
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-03-05 10:05 +0000
            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:03 -0500
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! John Brownalt <deconfliction@filteredperception.org> - 2014-02-07 10:47 +0000
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! CoolHand <coolhnd28@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 21:40 -0500
        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! JJ <jjdane@nospamgmail.com> - 2014-02-08 08:51 +0100
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Austin Wolfe <aewolfe@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2014-03-05 01:58 +0000
        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-03-05 09:37 +0000
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2014-03-05 14:25 +0100
            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-03-05 07:02 -0800
              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-06 10:55 +0000
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-06 12:09 +0000
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-03-06 14:13 +0100
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-06 16:56 +0000
                      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-06 17:05 +0000
                        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 14:39 +0100
                          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-16 17:25 +0000
                            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-19 22:47 +0100
                          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Chris J Dixon <chris@cdixon.me.uk> - 2014-03-17 08:20 +0000
                            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-19 22:55 +0100
                      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-03-06 21:18 +0100
                        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-06 23:00 +0000
                          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-03-07 00:53 +0100
                            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-07 04:58 +0000
                            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-07 10:11 +0000
                              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-03-07 21:04 +0100
                            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-07 10:52 +0000
                              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-07 13:02 +0200
                                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-07 12:26 +0000
                                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-07 15:15 +0000
                                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-07 20:55 +0000
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-03-06 14:03 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-06 17:55 +0000
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-03-06 13:43 +0000
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2014-03-06 10:48 -0800
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-06 19:45 +0000
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-03-06 13:15 -0800
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> - 2014-03-10 20:25 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2014-03-10 14:07 -0700
                      Usenet Archive (was. Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees!) Christian <chris_news@arcor.de> - 2014-03-22 09:40 +0100
                        Re: Usenet Archive (was. Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees!) "voyager529" <voyager529@live.com> - 2015-03-27 10:14 -0400
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-10 21:55 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-10 22:25 +0000
                      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 06:14 +0000
                        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-11 07:55 +0000
                          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 08:38 +0000
                            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 08:08 +0000
                          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-11 10:31 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-03-10 22:26 +0000
                      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Dario Niedermann <dnied@tiscali.it> - 2014-03-11 10:42 +0100
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-03-10 22:05 -0700
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Chris Elvidge <chris@raspberrypi.mshome.net> - 2014-03-11 10:48 +0000
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 09:48 -0500
            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-03-05 15:22 +0000
            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! nobody@nowhere.invalid (natp) - 2014-03-06 02:42 +0000
              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-03-06 06:08 -0600
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-06 14:10 +0200
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-03-06 13:26 +0000
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-03-06 16:56 +0200
                    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-06 18:25 +0200
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-07 11:55 -0500
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-07 19:30 +0000
        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-09 03:35 +0000
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-10 12:37 +0000
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-25 23:50 -0500
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 14:23 -0800
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-08 00:15 +0000
        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 16:41 -0800
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-08 10:09 -0500
            Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-08 15:44 +0000
              Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Brian Burns <spamcan@tannasg.tk> - 2014-02-08 17:18 +0000
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-08 18:34 +0000
                  Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-08 19:52 +0000
                Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-09 10:25 -0500
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-09 03:20 +0000
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> - 2014-02-09 09:36 -0800
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! junkmailid1@gmail.com - 2014-02-09 13:27 -0800
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! invis <invis@invis.net> - 2014-02-10 00:31 +0000
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! AnonymousCoward <florian.doyon@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 04:50 -0800
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! gm_stack <gm@stackunderflow.com> - 2014-02-10 05:04 -0800
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! arcfide@sacrideo.us (Aaron W. Hsu) - 2014-02-23 03:02 -0500
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 09:34 +0000
        Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-02-23 07:31 -0800
          Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 17:36 +0000
      Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-23 12:23 +0200
    Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees! scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-02-26 17:30 +0000

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#1329

FromRS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
Date2014-03-07 10:11 +0000
Message-ID<lfc604$htf$1@solani.org>
In reply to#1320
On 2014-03-06, Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote:
> I call that extreme egotism, or possibly narcissism.  

I'd call it a combination of arrogance and perhaps masochism - he enjoys
knowing it bothers others and enjoys not doing anything about it.  The 'Net is
full of those people, as hardly needs mentioning.

SLRN newsreader at least offers helpful killfile functionality where you simply
'downgrade' a user's posts.  That's easily circumvented by the offende
nymshifting, which remains a weakness of Usenet.  The really effective approach
is to have everyone systematically ignore the offender until he gets bored and
goes away.  Not easy ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1346

FromAragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid>
Date2014-03-07 21:04 +0100
Message-ID<lfd8o9$r1a$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1329
On Friday 07 March 2014 11:11, RS Wood conveyed the following to 
comp.misc...

> On 2014-03-06, Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I call that extreme egotism, or possibly narcissism.
> 
> I'd call it a combination of arrogance and perhaps masochism - he
> enjoys knowing it bothers others and enjoys not doing anything about
> it.  The 'Net is full of those people, as hardly needs mentioning.
> 
> SLRN newsreader at least offers helpful killfile functionality where
> you simply 'downgrade' a user's posts.  That's easily circumvented by
> the offende nymshifting, which remains a weakness of Usenet.  The
> really effective approach is to have everyone systematically ignore
> the offender until he gets bored and goes away.  Not easy ...

KNode also uses scores, and a threshold below which posts are no longer 
shown.  However, the action of marking them as read is separate.  One 
can also mark posts as read without that they are actually hidden from 
view.

One of the big downsides of KNode however is that it has loads of 
undocumented scoring features.  I wish someone would write the 
documentation for those.

-- 
= Aragorn =

         http://www.linuxcounter.net - registrant #223157

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1332

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2014-03-07 10:52 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhj96h.2urb.g.kreme@amelia.local>
In reply to#1320
In message <lfb1pu$j06$1@dont-email.me> 
  Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2014 00:00, Johny B Good conveyed the following to 
> comp.misc...

>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 21:18:20 +0100, Aragorn
>> <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thursday 06 March 2014 17:56, Johny B Good conveyed the following
>>> to comp.misc...
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:13:31 +0100, Aragorn
>>>> <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thursday 06 March 2014 13:09, RS Wood conveyed the following to
>>>>> comp.misc...
>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope to God no one is posting from GG here - vomit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Better get yourself a bucket then. :p
>>>> 
>>>> I take it that this a reference to the famous "Bit Bucket" I've
>>>> seen frequent mentions of, which I have yet to clap eyes upon. [...]
>>>
>>> No, I meant a real bucket.  He said he was going to vomit, see. :p
>> 
>> Oops! My bad. I find it's all too easy to get those two mixed up
>> whenever GoogleGroups is mentioned.

> I hear you.  Because of the low quality content - read: posters who 
> persist in maintaining an uncooperative attitude - in combination with 
> the repulsive mangling of Usenet posts by Google Groups, I have by now 
> added most of the newsgroups I'm subscribed to to my Google Groups 
> filter.  

I've been seriously tempted to simply killfile any post that contains
googlegroup in the references (I already kill them if they originate
from GG).


-- 
'But look,' said Ponder, 'the graveyards are full of people who rushed
in bravely but unwisely.' 'Ook.' 'What did he say?' said the Bursar.  'I
think he said, "Sooner or later the graveyards are full of everybody".'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1333

FromMarko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Date2014-03-07 13:02 +0200
Message-ID<87siqu9spt.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
In reply to#1332
Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>:

> I've been seriously tempted to simply killfile any post that contains
> googlegroup in the references (I already kill them if they originate
> from GG).

I put in my killfile anybody who talks about talking.

Oh, now I'm in my own killfile...


Marko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1338

FromTim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date2014-03-07 12:26 +0000
Message-ID<070320141226574170%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to#1333
In article <87siqu9spt.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>, Marko Rauhamaa
<marko@pacujo.net> wrote:

> Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>:
> 
> > I've been seriously tempted to simply killfile any post that contains
> > googlegroup in the references (I already kill them if they originate
> > from GG).
> 
> I put in my killfile anybody who talks about talking.
> 
> Oh, now I'm in my own killfile...

Well done. You've nailed the b/s going on here good and proper. There's
been too much content-free meta-discussion going on, not least by the
spammer-in-chief Mr Wood, who has posted more here than everyone else
put together. He'll get the ng he gets and like it.

-- 
"The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to
 lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores 
 the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them
 into it in the first place."                             - Douglas Adams

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1341

FromJohny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com>
Date2014-03-07 15:15 +0000
Message-ID<07ojh95pcptcpds6fnht3gss5f12n79jvh@4ax.com>
In reply to#1333
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:02:54 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
wrote:

>Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>:
>
>> I've been seriously tempted to simply killfile any post that contains
>> googlegroup in the references (I already kill them if they originate
>> from GG).
>
>I put in my killfile anybody who talks about talking.
>
>Oh, now I'm in my own killfile...
>

 You can laugh but it's entirely possible to killfile your own posts
as I discovered over a decade back when I accidently killfiled myself
(I think it was by subject though rather than by sender).

 Unfortunately with Free Agent, this mistake is no longer possible ( I
aint about to cough up for the full version when the freeby is just
sufficient for my needs - I've got an effective enough killfile built
into my mind already anyway).
-- 
Regards, J B Good

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1349

Fromgreymausg <maus@mail.com>
Date2014-03-07 20:55 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhka2m.adq.maus@gmaus.org>
In reply to#1341
On 2014-03-07, Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:02:54 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>:
>>
>>> I've been seriously tempted to simply killfile any post that contains
>>> googlegroup in the references (I already kill them if they originate
>>> from GG).
>>
>>I put in my killfile anybody who talks about talking.
>>
>>Oh, now I'm in my own killfile...
>>
>
>  You can laugh but it's entirely possible to killfile your own posts
> as I discovered over a decade back when I accidently killfiled myself
> (I think it was by subject though rather than by sender).
>
>  Unfortunately with Free Agent, this mistake is no longer possible ( I
> aint about to cough up for the full version when the freeby is just
> sufficient for my needs - I've got an effective enough killfile built
> into my mind already anyway).


Book once, "The Book of Ultimate failures"(or summat like that)had 
lists of people who went for election and got no votes. That was 
when you could  not vote for oneself. A friend of mine went for a local
election and nobody voted for him, which is how he discovered that his 
wife had voted for someone else.

-- 
maus
 .
  .
...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1292

FromAndy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk>
Date2014-03-06 14:03 +0000
Message-ID<leCdnUkhmt2wHYXOnZ2dnUVZ7t6dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
In reply to#1286
RS Wood wrote:

> On 2014-03-06, greymausg <maus@mail.com> wrote:
>
>> some Agents used on this group:
>>
>> 11	Mozilla
>> 9	G2
>>
>> (G2 is, I think, GooGleGroups). There are other agents but they do
>> not include  agent headers, I think)
>
> G2 is Gravity, I think, a Win app.  I hope to God no one is posting from GG
> here - vomit.

No, I think greymausg is correct, but if anyone is returning to usenet, 
then google groups is a pretty poor way of doing so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1305

Fromgreymausg <maus@mail.com>
Date2014-03-06 17:55 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhhbrg.5av.maus@gmaus.org>
In reply to#1292
On 2014-03-06, Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> wrote:
> RS Wood wrote:
>
>> On 2014-03-06, greymausg <maus@mail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> some Agents used on this group:
>>>
>>> 11	Mozilla
>>> 9	G2
>>>
>>> (G2 is, I think, GooGleGroups). There are other agents but they do
>>> not include  agent headers, I think)
>>
>> G2 is Gravity, I think, a Win app.  I hope to God no one is posting from GG
>> here - vomit.
>
> No, I think greymausg is correct, but if anyone is returning to usenet, 
> then google groups is a pretty poor way of doing so.
>
>
G2 is horrible, wwith those long lines, never could use it myself. Its 
a matter of balance, some of the most interesting posters use it.
I suppose like having a friend with a bad stutter.

(I aam told that the problem is that it reformats text)

I aam trying Knode now aafter this to see how it identifies as Agent:



-- 
maus
 .
  .
...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1293

FromWhiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com>
Date2014-03-06 13:43 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhgur4.76m.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net>
In reply to#1286
On 2014-03-06, RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> wrote:
> On 2014-03-06, greymausg <maus@mail.com> wrote:
>> some Agents used on this group:
>>
>> 11	Mozilla
>> 9	G2
>> 5	slrn
>> 4	Forte
>> 3	tin
>> 2	Gnus
>> 1	Thoth
>> 1	Pan
>> 1	NewsTap
>> 1	NewsgroupsRT
>> 1	Microsoft
>> 1	Claws
>> 1	Alpine
>>
>> (G2 is, I think, GooGleGroups). There are other agents but they do
>> not include  agent headers, I think)
>
> G2 is Gravity, I think, a Win app.  I hope to God no one is posting from GG
> here - vomit.  

"G2" is indeed the Google Groups web forum interface to usenet.  Of 850
articles in my local spool for comp.misc at the moment, 25 were posted
from there.

> I also use on a daily basis depending on what machine I'm in
> front of:
>
> Newswatcher MT (Mac OSX)
> Unison (Mac OSX)
> NNTP Reader (Android)
> Phonews (Android)
> Knode (Linux/KDE)
> Seamonkey (several OSes) (guess that's Mozilla on the above list)

As there seems to be some interest in such things, I'll start a group
statistics thread and see what happens ...

-- 
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
--  Whiskers 
-- ~~~~~~~~~~

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1308

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2014-03-06 10:48 -0800
Message-ID<bnru7bFe0hsU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#1284
greymausg wrote:

> some Agents used on this group:
>
> 11	Mozilla
> 9	G2
> 5	slrn
> 4	Forte
> 3	tin
> 2	Gnus
> 1	Thoth
> 1	Pan
> 1	NewsTap
> 1	NewsgroupsRT
> 1	Microsoft
> 1	Claws
> 1	Alpine
>
> (G2 is, I think, GooGleGroups). There are other agents but they do
> not include  agent headers, I think)

Your survey says 9/41 posters/messages here are GG (or 9 are and 32 are 
not GG).  I don't see nearly that many.  I would have suspected that you 
were using a server that didn't filter GG spam, but I see that you are 
using individual.net which has an excellent spam filter, including that 
sourced from GG.

I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who have 
posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.



-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1309

Fromgreymausg <maus@mail.com>
Date2014-03-06 19:45 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhhjiq.5qt.maus@gmaus.org>
In reply to#1308
On 2014-03-06, Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote:
> greymausg wrote:
>
>> some Agents used on this group:
>>
>> 11	Mozilla
>> 9	G2
>> 5	slrn
>> 4	Forte
>> 3	tin
>> 2	Gnus
>> 1	Thoth
>> 1	Pan
>> 1	NewsTap
>> 1	NewsgroupsRT
>> 1	Microsoft
>> 1	Claws
>> 1	Alpine
>>
>> (G2 is, I think, GooGleGroups). There are other agents but they do
>> not include  agent headers, I think)
>
> Your survey says 9/41 posters/messages here are GG (or 9 are and 32 are 
> not GG).  I don't see nearly that many.  I would have suspected that you 
> were using a server that didn't filter GG spam, but I see that you are 
> using individual.net which has an excellent spam filter, including that 
> sourced from GG.
>
> I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who have 
> posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.
>

The above script breaks (as in break) when if finds an identical From:
header. so `what', 13 different agents?

Only started reading comp.misc recently and havnt a good store of messages
in my spool, about 82, so I filtering them to see those who have neither
User-Agent: or X-Newsreader headers.

I wrote the scripts for alt.folklore.computers, but a troll on that board
,Speed, started using differing alias's, so reduced the usefullness of the
script.

The idea is to see how well (hard-to-learn but powerfull agents) like Gnus
compare in users against easy-but-dumb things like G2

Sampling a list of (generally linuxish groups)

3465	g2
603	xrn
202	Mozilla
112	Microsoft
69	Forte
40	slrn
33	trn
28	Gnus
27	Pan
21	Mutt
12	tin
11	MT-NewsWatcher
8	MacSOUP
7	Turnpike
6	NewsTap
5	Opera
5	Claws
4	Thunderbird
4	KMail
4	1
3	Thoth
3	Sylpheed
3	Direct
3	Alpine
2	Xnews
2	Roundcube
2	Pluto
2	Loom
1	XPN
1	Virtual
1	U
1	TomBNewz
1	THOR
1	SNews
1	Second
1	RoundCube
1	Postbox
1	Pineapple
1	PiaoHong
1	MR
1	Messenger-Pro
1	knews
1	K-9
1	Jan's
1	Hermes


`Thor' is likely Charle Gibbs Amiga!

(Some may not be agents. NewsBeuther seems to be slipping through)



-- 
maus
 .
  .
...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1311

Fromwjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com>
Date2014-03-06 13:15 -0800
Message-ID<af6441c7-c9d7-4aee-8260-1d31a62f65cc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#1308
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:48:11 PM UTC-5, Mike Easter wrote:
> I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who have
> posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.

I use it occasionally, when it's the only thing available or when
otherwise convenient to do so (like right now). Whenever I do use
GG, I fix (manually) all the stupid formatting problems that it
causes. Most of the time, however, I use a normal newsreader app or
http://squte.com to post (via Eternal September of Individual.net).

By the way, I'm apparently the only person that uses NewsgroupRT.
If you have Windows 8, it might be worth a look; I use it on my
tablet and I'm pretty happy with it. The developer is also pretty
responsive to bug reports and feature requests. I've gotten every-
thing I've asked for since I started using it.

-- 
I drive a '74 AMC Hornet in my dreams. Also, I really like cheese.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1432

FromKoen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com>
Date2014-03-10 20:25 +0000
Message-ID<lfl749$ofa$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1308
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:48:11 -0800, Mike Easter wrote:

> I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who have
> posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.

I posted a couple of times from Google Groups, because ports 119 & 443 
seem to be blocked on my office network (which is rather strange for a 
university).

Anyway, I won't do it again, I'll wait until I'm at home and use Pan to 
post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1434

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2014-03-10 14:07 -0700
Message-ID<bo6nscFmvgjU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#1432
Koen Lefever wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>> I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who
>> have posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.
>
> I posted a couple of times from Google Groups, because ports 119 &
> 443 seem to be blocked on my office network (which is rather strange
> for a university).

You are currently posting from e-s which also has a port 80 server

reader80.eternal-september.org

http://www.eternal-september.org/index.php?showpage=techinfo

> Anyway, I won't do it again, I'll wait until I'm at home and use Pan to
> post.

Once upon a time GG used to be useful for its search function on the 
archives, but now that is pretty much shot.

Also, once upon a time one could (also) post from GG without being 
'disruptive', but that is now b0rken as well.


-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1881 — Usenet Archive (was. Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees!)

FromChristian <chris_news@arcor.de>
Date2014-03-22 09:40 +0100
SubjectUsenet Archive (was. Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees!)
Message-ID<bp50klF57qhU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#1434
On 03/10/2014 10:07 PM, Mike Easter wrote:
> Once upon a time GG used to be useful for its search function on the 
> archives, but now that is pretty much shot.

I don't know why they killed the search function. It seems to be
incomplete not to mention the user interface! Is there any alternative?

- Chris

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#7207 — Re: Usenet Archive (was. Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees!)

From"voyager529" <voyager529@live.com>
Date2015-03-27 10:14 -0400
SubjectRe: Usenet Archive (was. Re: Welcome Slashdot refugees!)
Message-ID<551565c8$0$44167$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#1881
On 3/22/2014 4:40:56 AM, Christian wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 10:07 PM, Mike Easter wrote:
>> Once upon a time GG used to be useful for its search function on the
>> archives, but now that is pretty much shot.
> 
> I don't know why they killed the search function. It seems to be
> incomplete not to mention the user interface! Is there any alternative?
> 
> - Chris
> 

It's kind of ironic, IMO, that Google has made a mess of the "search"
function, given that that's what they're known for.

I've been using both Pan and NewsMan Pro, and been very happy with both, for
different reasons (Pan is simpler, NMP is more powerful)...but if you're
looking for browser based, I'm unaware of something besides Google Groups.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1437

Fromgreymausg <maus@mail.com>
Date2014-03-10 21:55 +0000
Message-ID<slrnlhsans.36r.maus@gmaus.org>
In reply to#1432
On 2014-03-10, Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:48:11 -0800, Mike Easter wrote:
>
>> I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who have
>> posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.
>
> I posted a couple of times from Google Groups, because ports 119 & 443 
> seem to be blocked on my office network (which is rather strange for a 
> university).
>
> Anyway, I won't do it again, I'll wait until I'm at home and use Pan to 
> post.

AFAImake out. Google removes EOLs, qnd dosn't reinsert them, because HTML 
will fit the data to the frame.. and their aim is to migrate all to HTML


-- 
maus
 .
  .
...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1438

FromTim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date2014-03-10 22:25 +0000
Message-ID<100320142225130175%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to#1432
In article <lfl749$ofa$1@dont-email.me>, Koen Lefever
<koen.lefever@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:48:11 -0800, Mike Easter wrote:
> 
> > I looked at 50 different posters' headers and saw only 2 GGers who have
> > posted since the Slashdot refugee migration.
> 
> I posted a couple of times from Google Groups, because ports 119 & 443 
> seem to be blocked on my office network (which is rather strange for a 
> university).

What are you doing posting from work?

-- 
"The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to
 lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores 
 the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them
 into it in the first place."                             - Douglas Adams

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1448

FromKoen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com>
Date2014-03-11 06:14 +0000
Message-ID<lfm9ji$k0g$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#1438
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:25:13 +0000, Tim Streater wrote:

> <koen.lefever@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I posted a couple of times from Google Groups, because ports 119 & 443
>> seem to be blocked on my office network (which is rather strange for a
>> university).
> 
> What are you doing posting from work?

I'm not sure if this is a serious question...

I teach philosophy, mathematics and information systems. It is by no 
means a 9-to-5 job.

I don't make a distinction between work time and free time. I have been 
correcting mid-term exams last weekend at home. I write my course 
material and do my research during the evening/night. Except when I am 
teaching a class or helping students or attending a meeting, nobody cares 
where I am or how I organize my time. 

Nowhere in my contract is mentioned how many hours I have to work, there 
even is no job description beyond "academic personnel". I have honestly 
no clue how many days of holiday I should have during a year. The past 4 
years I have been teaching summer schools (I really loved doing that), 
this year I will have the first summer vacation since 2009.

I do a lot of things for my university for which I am not paid (for 
example: system administration of our faculty's student grading system 
and training my colleagues on how to use it, or organizing evening 
debates for the alumni club), because it is a lot more than just a job to 
me: it is my life and my passion. 

I don't consider the university as my employer but as the community I 
belong to since I was a student. I am still involved in things I did here 
as a volunteer during my studies and I don't ask myself if that is part 
of my job or rather a hobby. 

When I decided that I wanted to spend a part of my time at the philosophy 
department or that I need to work for a month with a team of 
mathematicians in another country, I just informed my dean about that. No 
questions were asked, because he knows that I do my job.

So if I want to post on usenet or hack away on a computer game in the 
office I can just do that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.misc


csiph-web