Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #17733 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-04-03 11:19 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-04-05 10:09 +0000 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
[Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-03 11:19 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-04-03 12:20 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-03 14:20 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-04-03 16:22 -0400
Re: [Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-04-05 10:20 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 10:09 +0000
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-03 11:19 +0000 |
| Subject | [Link Posting] ?Beyond Sketchy': Facebook Demanding Some New Users' Email Passwords |
| Message-ID | <hRVQ4SuKVZ2URd6dP1pHa5vo@dont-email.me> |
####################################################################
# ATTENTION: This post is a reference to a website. The poster of #
# this Usenet article is not the author of the referenced website. #
####################################################################
<URL:https://www.thedailybeast.com/beyond-sketchy-facebook-demanding-som
e-new-users-email-passwords>
The text below is a quotation from the URL above:
>
> Just two weeks after admitting it stored hundreds of millions of its
> users' own passwords insecurely, Facebook is demanding some users fork
> over the password for their outside email account as the price of
> admission to the social network.
>
> Facebook users are being interrupted by an interstitial demanding they
> provide the password for the email account they gave to Facebook when
> signing up. "To continue using Facebook, you'll need to confirm your
> email," the message demands. "Since you signed up with [email address],
> you can do that automatically ... "
>
> A form below the message asked for the users' "email password."
>
> "That's beyond sketchy," security consultant Jake Williams told the
> Daily Beast. "They should not be taking your password or handling your
> password in the background. If that's what's required to sign up with
> Facebook, you're better off not being on Facebook."
>
> ...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-03 12:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20190403081831@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #17733 |
On 2019-04-03, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: ><URL:https://www.thedailybeast.com/beyond-sketchy-facebook-demanding-som > e-new-users-email-passwords> I still don't understand the attraction of this Facetube thing or whatever the hell it is. Looked real bad to me from the outset. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.) NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-03 14:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q82ffd$9cj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #17735 |
Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote: > On 2019-04-03, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >><URL:https://www.thedailybeast.com/beyond-sketchy-facebook-demanding-som >> e-new-users-email-passwords> > > I still don't understand the attraction of this Facetube thing or > whatever the hell it is. Looked real bad to me from the outset. Nor do I, nor do I have a faceplant account. I always saw it as the next "AOL" - and I always looked down on AOL.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-03 16:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <99hfnf-e7b.ln1@rasp.therandymon.com> |
| In reply to | #17733 |
On 2019-04-03, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >> Facebook users are being interrupted by an interstitial demanding >> they provide the password for the email account they gave to >> Facebook when signing up. "To continue using Facebook, you'll need >> to confirm your email," the message demands. "Since you signed up >> with [email address], you can do that automatically ... " >> >> A form below the message asked for the users' "email password." >> >> "That's beyond sketchy," security consultant Jake Williams told the >> Daily Beast. "They should not be taking your password or handling >> your password in the background. If that's what's required to sign >> up with Facebook, you're better off not being on Facebook." >> Far be it for me to defend Facebook, and I think they're sketchy too, but I find increasingly computer users struggle with even basic tasks requiring computer literacy, and FB is increasingly dealing with new markets of people with less computer literacy than even that ... they're trying to make it easy. That said, it's still shocking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-05 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <55fcadd5-ba76-5661-a60d-fc961dc99725@scorecrow.com> |
| In reply to | #17744 |
On 03/04/2019 21:22, RS Wood wrote: > On 2019-04-03, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >>> Facebook users are being interrupted by an interstitial demanding >>> they provide the password for the email account they gave to >>> Facebook when signing up. "To continue using Facebook, you'll need >>> to confirm your email," the message demands. "Since you signed up >>> with [email address], you can do that automatically ... " >>> >>> A form below the message asked for the users' "email password." >>> >>> "That's beyond sketchy," security consultant Jake Williams told the >>> Daily Beast. "They should not be taking your password or handling >>> your password in the background. If that's what's required to sign >>> up with Facebook, you're better off not being on Facebook." >>> > > Far be it for me to defend Facebook, and I think they're sketchy too, > but I find increasingly computer users struggle with even basic tasks > requiring computer literacy, and FB is increasingly dealing with new > markets of people with less computer literacy than even that ... they're > trying to make it easy. > > That said, it's still shocking. > Expect to start receiving spam emails from friends whose email is now being intercepted by Facebook. Does this now mean we all have to start putting corporate style disclaimers onto our personal emails? "The above message is a private correspondence between myself and the Usenet readers of comp.misc. Use of this message by a Corporation or other business entity is expressly forbidden. Blah blah blah." -- Bruce Horrocks Surrey England (bruce at scorecrow dot com)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-05 10:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ggonqpFa4gsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17760 |
On 2019-04-05, Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/2019 21:22, RS Wood wrote:
>> On 2019-04-03, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Facebook users are being interrupted by an interstitial demanding
>>>> they provide the password for the email account they gave to
>>>> Facebook when signing up. "To continue using Facebook, you'll need
>>>> to confirm your email," the message demands. "Since you signed up
>>>> with [email address], you can do that automatically ... "
>>>>
>>>> A form below the message asked for the users' "email password."
>>>>
>>>> "That's beyond sketchy," security consultant Jake Williams told the
>>>> Daily Beast. "They should not be taking your password or handling
>>>> your password in the background. If that's what's required to sign
>>>> up with Facebook, you're better off not being on Facebook."
>>>>
>>
>> Far be it for me to defend Facebook, and I think they're sketchy too,
>> but I find increasingly computer users struggle with even basic tasks
>> requiring computer literacy, and FB is increasingly dealing with new
>> markets of people with less computer literacy than even that ... they're
>> trying to make it easy.
>>
>> That said, it's still shocking.
>>
> Expect to start receiving spam emails from friends whose email is now
> being intercepted by Facebook.
>
> Does this now mean we all have to start putting corporate style
> disclaimers onto our personal emails?
>
> "The above message is a private correspondence between myself and the
> Usenet readers of comp.misc. Use of this message by a Corporation or
> other business entity is expressly forbidden. Blah blah blah."
You can if you want. No-one will pay the slightest attention.
--
Today is Setting Orange, the 22nd day of Discord in the YOLD 3185
1. What power do you have? 2. Where did you get it? 3. In whose
interests do you exercise it? 4. To whom are you accountable? 5. How
can we get rid of you?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web