Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #2879 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-19 15:44 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-05-21 13:06 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 200 — 45 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-19 15:47 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-19 21:33 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 10:32 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 11:01 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 11:38 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 12:23 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-21 12:40 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-21 15:59 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 13:16 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-21 18:38 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 13:18 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2014-05-21 13:46 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 21:22 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 15:03 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 15:20 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> - 2014-05-22 21:40 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-22 08:20 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-22 18:14 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-23 07:21 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn pechter@tucker.pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2014-05-21 19:11 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-21 20:18 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 21:16 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-21 22:19 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-21 23:02 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2014-05-22 05:42 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-22 19:22 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-22 19:26 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-22 17:52 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-22 18:02 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 02:02 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 13:16 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 06:51 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-23 09:35 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 19:55 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2014-05-23 09:49 -0600
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-23 19:24 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2014-05-23 14:23 -0600
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 16:19 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-23 07:32 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 07:09 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 09:36 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 19:00 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 15:21 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-23 21:58 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-24 00:34 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-24 10:22 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-23 17:35 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-24 10:20 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:41 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-24 00:33 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-24 10:39 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-24 09:28 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-24 13:13 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-24 10:51 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-24 18:50 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-24 20:05 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stan Barr <plan.b@dsl.pipex.com> - 2014-05-24 16:22 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-24 19:30 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-26 09:36 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-26 15:01 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-26 22:02 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-26 19:17 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-26 15:40 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-26 22:14 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-25 22:30 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-26 05:02 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-24 20:34 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-24 13:36 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-24 16:29 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 14:47 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-25 22:43 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-25 17:56 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-26 11:49 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-26 14:18 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-28 17:46 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-28 20:11 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-28 13:29 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-28 19:19 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-29 14:10 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-30 00:42 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-30 05:48 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-29 18:00 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-29 13:17 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-30 15:57 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-30 15:55 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-05-30 20:32 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-31 08:50 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-06-01 10:11 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-06-01 16:07 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-29 18:42 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lawrence Statton <lawrence@perl.mx> - 2014-05-29 14:15 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-29 15:32 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-28 19:13 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-28 14:44 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-28 22:45 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-30 11:10 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2014-05-29 05:48 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:26 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-26 13:06 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-26 12:35 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Christian Corti <use@reply.to> - 2014-05-28 17:49 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-28 13:06 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "ratty" <ratty@gmail.com> - 2014-05-30 14:16 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-30 04:47 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-30 11:41 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "ratty" <ratty@gmail.com> - 2014-05-30 21:05 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bernd Felsche <berfel@innovative.iinet.net.au> - 2014-05-30 19:16 +0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:02 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-26 18:44 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 21:10 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-26 21:14 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-26 21:45 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 23:59 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 23:44 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2014-05-27 11:35 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-26 20:25 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-26 13:38 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-27 13:59 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-06-14 18:05 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Oeter Johns" <oj19854@nospam.com> - 2014-06-15 07:32 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-15 00:50 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-06-15 16:44 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 16:27 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 14:53 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "2ju" <2ju@gmail.com> - 2014-05-25 06:59 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-24 22:44 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-29 13:40 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-29 20:01 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-05-24 19:01 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-25 00:58 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-25 13:17 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-26 17:08 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-25 10:17 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-22 09:54 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-22 15:56 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-22 14:07 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2014-05-23 12:44 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-21 08:20 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-22 17:58 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-23 00:00 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-22 18:12 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 09:50 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-23 18:37 +0300
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 16:59 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-23 12:08 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-23 12:03 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-23 21:58 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 03:20 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-24 13:11 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:47 -0400
What constitutes being a Yankee? [was Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn] Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2014-05-29 14:58 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 15:59 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2014-05-23 23:41 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-24 04:09 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2014-05-24 21:31 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-05-25 14:34 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bernd Felsche <berfel@innovative.iinet.net.au> - 2014-05-23 16:15 +0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-21 14:15 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-21 14:35 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu (Bill Gunshannon) - 2014-05-21 14:38 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-05-21 08:22 -0800
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2014-05-21 15:43 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-22 15:54 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2014-05-21 07:07 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-21 15:23 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-19 23:10 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-19 22:54 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-20 19:52 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-20 23:22 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-20 11:10 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-20 11:56 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-20 12:32 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2014-05-20 15:24 -0500
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2014-05-21 14:08 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-21 16:06 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-20 13:50 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Rob Brown <brown@greenslade.gmcl.internal> - 2014-05-20 19:49 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 10:35 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-05-20 21:11 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-20 21:20 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-20 13:45 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-05-21 05:31 +1000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> - 2014-05-21 09:35 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-20 15:14 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Rob Brown <brown@greenslade.gmcl.internal> - 2014-05-20 20:00 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-05-20 16:45 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-20 21:14 -0700
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-21 09:42 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-21 10:33 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2014-05-20 13:40 +0000
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-21 09:40 +0200
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-21 08:27 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-05-21 12:11 -0400
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 20:52 +0100
Re: Revamped PDP-11 in Brooklyn jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2014-05-21 13:06 +0000
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | pechter@tucker.pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 19:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <llitpc$n6$1@pechter.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #2952 |
In article <bu3ndcF8gbeU6@mid.individual.net>, Huge <usenet@huge.org.uk> wrote: >On 2014-05-21, Bill Gunshannon <bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu> wrote: >> In article <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net>, >> Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> writes: >>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: >>> >>>> On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could eat. >>>>> >>>>> Is that why you are Huge? :-) >>>> >>>> One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given name, >>>> I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down to 16.5 >>>> at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me for >>>> decades. >>> >>> I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 >>> stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. >>> Aiming to lose a bit more now...! >>> >> >> How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? > >14 lb. So, when I really *was* "Huge", I was 280lb. > >> Sorry, here it is :-) >> >> I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or scrambling >> for Google to find out just what that means. > >Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British >terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the >fortnight. > > >-- >Today is Sweetmorn, the 68th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180 >"I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your >immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on >another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811 I'd expect in this group the following comment would ring true. Anyone remember the microfortnight? For those who dont: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_system Bill -- -- Digital had it then. Don't you wish you could buy it now! pechter-at-pechter.dyndns.org http://xkcd.com/705/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 20:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bu4g0nF1v2cU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2971 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 19:11:40 +0000, William Pechter wrote: >>Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British >>terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the >>fortnight. > I'd expect in this group the following comment would ring true. > > Anyone remember the microfortnight? I mentioned it earlier in the thread. > For those who dont: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_system One attoparsec per microfortnight is about 1 inch per second. (and my lectures last for almost exactly a microcentury, while we're at it) -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 21:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100> |
| In reply to | #2952 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:18:36 +0100, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2014-05-21, Bill Gunshannon <bill@server3.cs.scranton.edu> wrote: >> In article <bu3k5kF1v2cU3@mid.individual.net>, >> Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> writes: >>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:38:19 +0000, Huge wrote: >>> >>>> On 2014-05-21, Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 10:32:48 +0000, Huge wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Happy days, and as many free biscuits/bags of crisps as you could >>>>>> eat. >>>>> >>>>> Is that why you are Huge? :-) >>>> >>>> One of the reasons. It differs only by one letter from my given name, >>>> I'm 6'3" and have been 20 stone in the past (although back down to >>>> 16.5 >>>> at the moment), and it's what my friends have been calling me for >>>> decades. >>> >>> I was a bit over 21 stone this time last year. I'm now a bit under 17 >>> stone although I've kept it fairly static at 17 stone since Christmas. >>> Aiming to lose a bit more now...! >>> >> >> How big are those stones? Pebbles? Boulders? > > 14 lb. So, when I really *was* "Huge", I was 280lb. > >> Sorry, here it is :-) >> >> I am sure most of our American readers are either confused or scrambling >> for Google to find out just what that means. > > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the > fortnight. > > What about pints!! -- It's a money /life balance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 22:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <210520142219043033%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #2973 |
In article <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100>, Stanley Daniel de Liver <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: > > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British > > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the > > fortnight. > What about pints!! They downgraded it. -- "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-21 23:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1405212301370.6003@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #2976 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tim Streater wrote: > In article <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100>, Stanley Daniel de Liver > <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British >> > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the >> > fortnight. > >> What about pints!! > > They downgraded it. > Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 05:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20140522054253.aa8ba84ea8b3c4001e450e77@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #2980 |
On Wed, 21 May 2014 23:02:05 -0400 Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tim Streater wrote: > > > In article <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100>, Stanley Daniel de Liver > > <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: > > > >> > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British > >> > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the > >> > fortnight. > > > >> What about pints!! > > > > They downgraded it. > > > Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? Both IME. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 19:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <220520141922019725%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #2980 |
In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1405212301370.6003@darkstar.example.org>, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tim Streater wrote: > > > In article <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100>, Stanley Daniel de Liver > > <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: > > > >> > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British > >> > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the > >> > fortnight. > > > >> What about pints!! > > > > They downgraded it. > > > Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. -- "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 19:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lllfhb$63d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2996 |
"Tim Streater" <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote in message news:220520141922019725%timstreater@greenbee.net... > > They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. "A pint of water weighs a pound and a quarter" "Two and a quarter pounds of jam weighs about a kilogram" etc etc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 17:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1405221751470.8693@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #2996 |
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Tim Streater wrote: > In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1405212301370.6003@darkstar.example.org>, > Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tim Streater wrote: >> >> > In article <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100>, Stanley Daniel de Liver >> > <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> > >> >> > Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete British >> >> > terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the stone. And the >> >> > fortnight. >> > >> >> What about pints!! >> > >> > They downgraded it. >> > >> Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? > > They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. > But I figured you were talking about beer, hence I wondered if you were talking about quality. Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Charlie Gibbs" <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-22 18:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <985.290T421T10824102@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
| In reply to | #2996 |
In article <220520141922019725%timstreater@greenbee.net>, timstreater@greenbee.net (Tim Streater) writes: > In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1405212301370.6003@darkstar.example.org>, > Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tim Streater wrote: >> >>> In article <op.xf77w8i1o4et73@dell3100>, Stanley Daniel de Liver >>> <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>> >>>>> Interesting that although America has retained much obsolete >>>>> British terminology, usage and units, they have discarded the >>>>> stone. And the fortnight. >>>> >>>> What about pints!! >>> >>> They downgraded it. >> >> Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? > > They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. And charged the same, no doubt. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 02:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <llma8i$das$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #3010 |
In alt.sys.pdp11 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote: (snip) >>> Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? >> They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. > And charged the same, no doubt. And for some interesting unit questions, the duty free allowance coming into the US is 1 liter, and for going into Canada (such as from the US) it is 40 ounces. I am not sure which ounces those are, as Canada has been metric for some years now. I presume that they are not US fluid ounces. It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages just for sale in duty free stores. -- glen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 13:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <bu7st7F7a6cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #3011 |
"glen herrmannsfeldt" <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote in message news:llma8i$das$1@speranza.aioe.org... > In alt.sys.pdp11 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote: > > (snip) > >>>> Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? > >>> They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. > >> And charged the same, no doubt. > > And for some interesting unit questions, the duty free allowance > coming into the US is 1 liter, and for going into Canada (such as > from the US) it is 40 ounces. > > I am not sure which ounces those are, as Canada has been metric > for some years now. I presume that they are not US fluid ounces. > > It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages > just for sale in duty free stores. We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. And I notice the british have 500ml bottles too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 06:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <llmr4q$dks$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #3012 |
In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: (snip, I wrote) >> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >> just for sale in duty free stores. > We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. > And I notice the british have 500ml bottles too. Until recently Washington state liquor stores were state run, but now they are private. That might have changed what is available. -- glen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 09:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.xga0tal7o4et73@dell3100> |
| In reply to | #3014 |
On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:51:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: > (snip, I wrote) > >>> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >>> just for sale in duty free stores. > >> We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. > Wine seems to invariably come in 700ml bottles (or larger boxes) I can't believe wine-makers use different size bottles depending on the export market. >> And I notice the british have 500ml bottles too. yes, packaged goods have to be sold in metric amounts (even if milk seems to be sold in 568ml, 1l 1.136l, and 2l sizes in the same shop) > > Until recently Washington state liquor stores were state run, > but now they are private. That might have changed what is > available. > lf > -- glen -- It's a money /life balance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 19:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <bu8k9uFbvulU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #3018 |
"Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:op.xga0tal7o4et73@dell3100... > On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:51:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt > <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > >> In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> (snip, I wrote) >> >>>> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >>>> just for sale in duty free stores. >> >>> We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. > Wine seems to invariably come in 700ml bottles (or larger boxes) That isnt true of magnums most obviously. > I can't believe wine-makers use different size bottles depending on the > export market. >>> And I notice the british have 500ml bottles too. > yes, packaged goods have to be sold in metric amounts Not true of beer and wine and spirits. > (even if milk seems to be sold in 568ml, 1l 1.136l, and 2l sizes in the > same shop) >> Until recently Washington state liquor stores were state run, >> but now they are private. That might have changed what is >> available.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 09:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <1bioow337t.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> |
| In reply to | #3018 |
"Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> writes: > On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:51:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt > <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > >> In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> (snip, I wrote) >> >>>> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >>>> just for sale in duty free stores. >> >>> We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. >> > Wine seems to invariably come in 700ml bottles (or larger boxes) > I can't believe wine-makers use different size bottles depending on > the export market. Checking in my fridge... either you meant 750ml, or they do indeed use different size bottles in different (not necessarily export) markets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 19:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.xgbr2rz2o4et73@dell3100> |
| In reply to | #3029 |
On Fri, 23 May 2014 16:49:10 +0100, Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote: > "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> writes: > >> On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:51:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt >> <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: >> >>> In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>> (snip, I wrote) >>> >>>>> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >>>>> just for sale in duty free stores. >>> >>>> We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. >>> >> Wine seems to invariably come in 700ml bottles (or larger boxes) >> I can't believe wine-makers use different size bottles depending on >> the export market. > > Checking in my fridge... either you meant 750ml, or they do indeed use > different size bottles in different (not necessarily export) markets. Wine in a fridge? heathen! Yup sorry, 750ml. but my bottle is now at 700ml! -- It's a money /life balance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 14:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <1b7g5c2qj0.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> |
| In reply to | #3034 |
"Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> writes: > On Fri, 23 May 2014 16:49:10 +0100, Joe Pfeiffer > <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote: > >> "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> writes: >> >>> On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:51:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt >>> <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> (snip, I wrote) >>>> >>>>>> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >>>>>> just for sale in duty free stores. >>>> >>>>> We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. >>>> >>> Wine seems to invariably come in 700ml bottles (or larger boxes) >>> I can't believe wine-makers use different size bottles depending on >>> the export market. >> >> Checking in my fridge... either you meant 750ml, or they do indeed use >> different size bottles in different (not necessarily export) markets. > > Wine in a fridge? heathen! Yup sorry, 750ml. > but my bottle is now at 700ml! My doctor doesn't like either my or my wife's triglycerides. Drinking the bottle in a night isn't allowed....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-24 16:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tcm65b-h8p.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #3034 |
On 2014-05-23, Stanley Daniel de Liver <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 2014 16:49:10 +0100, Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> > wrote: > >> "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <admin@127.0.0.1> writes: >> >>> On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:51:06 +0100, glen herrmannsfeldt >>> <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> In alt.sys.pdp11 Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> (snip, I wrote) >>>> >>>>>> It seems that they make special 1l bottles of alcoholic beverages >>>>>> just for sale in duty free stores. >>>> >>>>> We have those in the normal stores, along with the 750ml bottles. >>>> >>> Wine seems to invariably come in 700ml bottles (or larger boxes) >>> I can't believe wine-makers use different size bottles depending on >>> the export market. >> >> Checking in my fridge... either you meant 750ml, or they do indeed use >> different size bottles in different (not necessarily export) markets. > > Wine in a fridge? heathen! Yup sorry, 750ml. > but my bottle is now at 700ml! In my experience 70cl is the standard size for wine bottles in the UK and Europe. I am fairly sure that was the size of a standard spirit bottle in the UK when I was there, but because the duty free allowance was a litre per person, duty free outlets had 1 litre bottles. In the 1980s Zambia had a duty free allowance of "1 bottle of spirits" without specifying a size. Once you realised that you could look for larger bottles, which were indeed stocked in Heathrow Duty Free. -- Paul Sture The final step of #heartbleed recovery is to call your mother, and advise her to change her maiden name -- @gojomo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-23 07:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <230520140732078114%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #3011 |
In article <llma8i$das$1@speranza.aioe.org>, glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > In alt.sys.pdp11 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote: > > (snip) > > >>> Are you talking about a downgrade of size, or quality? > > >> They downgraded the size from 20 fl.oz to 16. > > > And charged the same, no doubt. > > And for some interesting unit questions, the duty free allowance > coming into the US is 1 liter, ... One liter than what? -- "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web