Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #5225 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-10-04 22:38 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-10-05 23:17 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-04 22:38 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-05 00:47 -0700
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-10-05 13:01 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-05 12:38 -0600
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-05 23:11 -0600
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-06 02:50 -0700
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-10-06 10:22 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-06 22:54 -0600
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap "D.D." <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-07 01:21 -0700
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-10-08 18:40 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-10-09 01:10 -0400
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-10-09 16:08 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2014-10-07 17:35 -0700
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-07 22:31 -0600
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-10-08 16:05 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-10-07 16:33 +0300
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-10-05 13:37 +0000
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> - 2014-10-05 19:24 +0100
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-10-05 19:28 +0100
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> - 2014-10-05 20:05 +0100
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-10-05 20:07 +0100
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> - 2014-10-05 20:20 +0100
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-10-05 22:15 +0100
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2014-10-05 15:50 -0500
Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-10-05 23:17 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-05 20:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com> |
| In reply to | #5234 |
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes: > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room. > > A laptop here would use considerable more room. What do you mean by that curious remark?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-05 20:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <051020142007350851%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #5236 |
In article <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>, David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes: > > > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume > > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from > >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you > >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room. > > > > A laptop here would use considerable more room. > > What do you mean by that curious remark? I use a Mac Mini which is quite small. -- "The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them into it in the first place." - Douglas Adams
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-05 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7zlhou727u.fsf@example.com> |
| In reply to | #5237 |
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes: > In article <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>, David Hume > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes: >> >> > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume >> > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from >> >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you >> >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room. >> > >> > A laptop here would use considerable more room. >> >> What do you mean by that curious remark? > > I use a Mac Mini which is quite small. Oh yes I think I have seen one of those. They are rather expensive though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-05 22:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <051020142215130350%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| In reply to | #5238 |
In article <7zlhou727u.fsf@example.com>, David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes: > > > In article <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>, David Hume > > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes: > >> > >> > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume > >> > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from > >> >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you > >> >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room. > >> > > >> > A laptop here would use considerable more room. > >> > >> What do you mean by that curious remark? > > > > I use a Mac Mini which is quite small. > > Oh yes I think I have seen one of those. They are rather expensive > though. Worth it not to be running Windows. -- "I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend.... if you have one." - GB Shaw to Churchill "Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second... if there is one." - Winston Churchill, in response.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-05 15:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3d2dnd8t7vmCMqzJnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #5233 |
On 2014-10-05, David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: > I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from > its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you > ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room. I did that for a few years myself and up until about 18 months ago I went back to a desktop for my @home work. OMGF am I glad I did. I forgot how much better a real full size keyboard is. I bought a cherry blue switch keyboard. I also got a modest video card. One of the few games I play is Nexuiz and I easily get 400 fps @ 2560 x 1080. And speaking of displays, I have a nice 25" LG ultra wide 2560 x 1080 display. The tower is silent, easy to open, easy to swap the hard drive, upgrade the video card or add memory. For my next desktop maybe I'll go with duel 8 core xeons. Nice to have a desktop. -- Marek Novotny A member of the Linux Foundation http://www.linuxfoundation.org git with the program
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-05 23:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <GsjYv.462514$O%1.386933@fx31.am4> |
| In reply to | #5239 |
"Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote in message news:3d2dnd8t7vmCMqzJnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com... > On 2014-10-05, David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote: >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room. > > I did that for a few years myself and up until about 18 months ago I > went back to a desktop for my @home work. OMGF am I glad I did. I > forgot how much better a real full size keyboard is. I bought a cherry > blue switch keyboard. So did I for a year or two (and it was a small netbook-size model). However, I used it with a full-size keyboard, full-size mouse, AC cord, normal monitor, ethernet etc plugged into it. So it was indistinguishable in use from a desktop PC (the latter might have been more powerful). The advantage was, if I had to travel anywhere, everything I needed was already on it. -- Bartc
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web