Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #5225 > unrolled thread

Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap

Started byRich <rich@example.invalid>
First post2014-10-04 22:38 +0000
Last post2014-10-05 23:17 +0100
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.misc


Contents

  Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-04 22:38 +0000
    Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-05 00:47 -0700
      Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-10-05 13:01 +0000
      Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-05 12:38 -0600
        Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-05 15:51 -0700
      Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-05 23:11 -0600
        Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-06 02:50 -0700
          Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-10-06 10:22 +0000
            Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-06 22:54 -0600
              Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap "D.D." <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-07 01:21 -0700
                Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-10-08 18:40 +0000
                  Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-10-09 01:10 -0400
                    Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-10-09 16:08 +0000
              Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2014-10-07 17:35 -0700
                Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-10-07 22:31 -0600
                  Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-10-08 16:05 +0000
            Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-10-07 16:33 +0300
    Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-10-05 13:37 +0000
    Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> - 2014-10-05 19:24 +0100
      Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-10-05 19:28 +0100
        Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> - 2014-10-05 20:05 +0100
          Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-10-05 20:07 +0100
            Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> - 2014-10-05 20:20 +0100
              Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-10-05 22:15 +0100
      Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2014-10-05 15:50 -0500
        Re: Desktop PCs aren't going anywhere, despite the growth of phones and tablets - because they're cheap "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-10-05 23:17 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#5236

FromDavid Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com>
Date2014-10-05 20:05 +0100
Message-ID<7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>
In reply to#5234
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:

> In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
> <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from
>> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you
>> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room.
>
> A laptop here would use considerable more room.

What do you mean by that curious remark?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5237

FromTim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date2014-10-05 20:07 +0100
Message-ID<051020142007350851%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to#5236
In article <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
<David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:

> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:
> 
> > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
> > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from
> >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you
> >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room.
> >
> > A laptop here would use considerable more room.
> 
> What do you mean by that curious remark?

I use a Mac Mini which is quite small.

-- 
"The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to
 lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores 
 the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them
 into it in the first place."                             - Douglas Adams

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5238

FromDavid Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com>
Date2014-10-05 20:20 +0100
Message-ID<7zlhou727u.fsf@example.com>
In reply to#5237
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:

> In article <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
> <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:
>>
>> > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
>> > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from
>> >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you
>> >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room.
>> >
>> > A laptop here would use considerable more room.
>>
>> What do you mean by that curious remark?
>
> I use a Mac Mini which is quite small.

Oh yes I think I have seen one of those. They are rather expensive
though.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5240

FromTim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Date2014-10-05 22:15 +0100
Message-ID<051020142215130350%timstreater@greenbee.net>
In reply to#5238
In article <7zlhou727u.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
<David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:

> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:
> 
> > In article <7zppe672we.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
> > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> writes:
> >>
> >> > In article <7zy4su74u3.fsf@example.com>, David Hume
> >> > <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from
> >> >> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you
> >> >> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room.
> >> >
> >> > A laptop here would use considerable more room.
> >>
> >> What do you mean by that curious remark?
> >
> > I use a Mac Mini which is quite small.
> 
> Oh yes I think I have seen one of those. They are rather expensive
> though.

Worth it not to be running Windows.

-- 
"I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a
friend.... if you have one." - GB Shaw to Churchill "Cannot possibly
attend first night, will attend second...  if there is one." - Winston
Churchill, in response.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5239

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2014-10-05 15:50 -0500
Message-ID<3d2dnd8t7vmCMqzJnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#5233
On 2014-10-05, David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from
> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you
> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room.

I did that for a few years myself and up until about 18 months ago I
went back to a desktop for my @home work. OMGF am I glad I did. I
forgot how much better a real full size keyboard is. I bought a cherry
blue switch keyboard. 

I also got a modest video card. One of the few games I play is Nexuiz
and I easily get 400 fps @ 2560 x 1080. 

And speaking of displays, I have a nice 25" LG ultra wide 2560 x 1080
display. The tower is silent, easy to open, easy to swap the hard drive,
upgrade the video card or add memory. 

For my next desktop maybe I'll go with duel 8 core xeons. Nice to have a
desktop. 

-- 
Marek Novotny
A member of the Linux Foundation
http://www.linuxfoundation.org
git with the program

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5241

From"BartC" <bc@freeuk.com>
Date2014-10-05 23:17 +0100
Message-ID<GsjYv.462514$O%1.386933@fx31.am4>
In reply to#5239
"Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote in message 
news:3d2dnd8t7vmCMqzJnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 2014-10-05, David Hume <David.Hume@hushmail.com> wrote:
>> I use my laptop as a desktop PC. That is to say, I never move it from
>> its place on the desk. 'Why don't you use a desktop?' I hear you
>> ask. Because a laptop uses less power, and less room.
>
> I did that for a few years myself and up until about 18 months ago I
> went back to a desktop for my @home work. OMGF am I glad I did. I
> forgot how much better a real full size keyboard is. I bought a cherry
> blue switch keyboard.

So did I for a year or two (and it was a small netbook-size model).

However, I used it with a full-size keyboard, full-size mouse, AC cord, 
normal monitor, ethernet etc plugged into it. So it was indistinguishable in 
use from a desktop PC (the latter might have been more powerful).

The advantage was, if I had to travel anywhere, everything I needed was 
already on it.

-- 
Bartc 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.misc


csiph-web