Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #4560 > unrolled thread

In the land of free speech, this is scary.

Started byShadow <Sh@dow.br>
First post2014-08-27 19:10 -0300
Last post2014-08-29 18:04 -0300
Articles 2 on this page of 22 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.misc


Contents

  In the land of free speech, this is scary. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-08-27 19:10 -0300
    Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-08-27 19:24 -0400
      Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-08-27 20:59 -0300
        Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-08-27 22:57 -0400
        Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. "D.D." <xyzzy@inbox.com> - 2014-08-27 21:51 -0700
    Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-08-28 13:02 +1000
      Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-28 20:59 +0000
        Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-08-29 15:24 +0100
          Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-08-29 18:07 -0300
            Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-30 17:09 +0000
              Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-08-30 13:08 -0600
                Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-31 01:23 +0300
                  Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-31 17:04 +0000
                    Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-31 22:06 +0300
                  Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-08-31 13:57 -0600
                    Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-31 23:26 +0300
              Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-08-31 00:31 +0100
                Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-08-30 23:42 +0000
                  Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-08-31 08:11 +0100
                    Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-08-31 08:29 +0000
                    Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2014-09-01 20:22 +0100
        Re: In the land of free speech, this is scary. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-08-29 18:04 -0300

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#4627

FromBruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com>
Date2014-09-01 20:22 +0100
Message-ID<5404C77D.40209@scorecrow.com>
In reply to#4609
On 31/08/2014 08:11, Hils wrote:
> On 2014-08-31 00:42, Bob Eager wrote:
>> The money she gets is in exchange for the income from the Crown Estates.
>> Not even many Brits know this.
>>
>>    http://www.royal.gov.uk/TheRoyalHousehold/Royalfinances/
>> CrownEstatesxyz.aspx
>
> There are also hidden costs, paid by taxpayers:
>
> http://republic.org.uk/what-we-want/royal-finances
[snip]

What a naive and ludicrous website - they seem to believe that a 
'democratic' alternative to the monarchy would be less expensive.

-- 
Bruce Horrocks
Surrey
England
(bruce at scorecrow dot com)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#4596

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2014-08-29 18:04 -0300
Message-ID<rlq10a5um38e31gd47oq5bif423arm9oho@4ax.com>
In reply to#4576
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 20:59:46 +0000 (GMT+00:00), RS Wood
<rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:

>That said, the overarching point is: are Americans feeling more
> scared or more anxious?  And do they self-censor because of fear
> their words will have consequences and/or recrimination?  You
> betcha.  You don't find people talking freely on Facebook anymore
> now that the cops are all searching it as part of their
> background checks, for example: that much at least is
> true.

	At last. Someone understood.
	;)
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.misc


csiph-web