Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #463 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-16 17:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-02-17 04:11 +0411 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
Killer drones home in on cell phones "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Killer drones home in on cell phones RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-16 23:29 +0000
Re: Killer drones home in on cell phones Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-17 00:08 -0800
Re: Killer drones home in on cell phones "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-17 04:11 +0411
| From | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-16 17:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Killer drones home in on cell phones |
| Message-ID | <4453-0@usenet.squte.com> |
tdk writes: The Intercept is reporting that a new whistle-blower confirms US drones in Afghanistan home in on cell phones to target individuals. "[The NSA] also equips drones and other aircraft with devices known as 'virtual base-tower transceivers' � creating, in effect, a fake cell phone tower that can force a targeted person�s device to lock onto the NSA�s receiver without their knowledge." "What�s more, he adds, the NSA often locates drone targets by analyzing the activity of a SIM card, rather than the actual content of the calls. Based on his experience, he has come to believe that the drone program amounts to little more than death by unreliable metadata." "https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/02/10/the-nsas-secret-role/" -- View this thread at http://squte.com/node/4453
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-16 23:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ldrhkl$so2$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #463 |
On 2014-02-16, tdk <forum.tdk@squte.com> wrote: > tdk writes: > > The Intercept is reporting that a new whistle-blower confirms US drones in Afghanistan > home in on cell phones to target individuals. > "[The NSA] also equips drones and other aircraft with devices known as 'virtual > base-tower transceivers' � creating, in effect, a fake cell phone tower that can > force a targeted person�s device to lock onto the NSA�s receiver without their knowledge." > "What�s more, he adds, the NSA often locates drone targets by analyzing the activity of a SIM card, rather than the actual content of the calls. Based on his experience, he has come to believe that the drone program amounts to little more than death by unreliable metadata." > "https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/02/10/the-nsas-secret-role/" > I'm busy writing a short story: a dystopia set in about 2030. This little gem will make a nice addition to my depiction of a world turned in on itself. Again, truth is stranger than fiction. Some day, we'll look back and say 'we brought it on ourselves.' The irony is, while Orwell wrote about a surveillance state willfully imposed on the people, our surveillance state basically came about by consumer choice. "Ooh, shiny!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-17 00:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ldsg1g$ab3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #463 |
I would have thought that this is common knowledge by now. Are these muhajideen really using cell phones to communicate with each other? I would have thought that any insurgents would avoid cell phones like the plague. Maybe it's just the ones who are still alive that do. > "What’s more, he adds, the NSA often locates drone targets by analyzing > the activity of a SIM card, rather than the actual content of the > calls. Based on his experience, he has come to believe that the drone > program amounts to little more than death by unreliable metadata." I think this guy is trying to say that the spooks hoover up 'metadata' (who doesn't believe this is everything they can get including voice and all data?) and then once they have associated the IMEI of the phone with undesirable activity, they then home in on that phone next time it talks to the network and blow the user up. File this under 'it was safe to assume all this years ago?'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-17 04:11 +0411 |
| Message-ID | <4453-10443@usenet.squte.com> |
| In reply to | #470 |
> I would have thought that this is common knowledge by now. You are right, but I posted the article anyway because it's the first time its been confirmed, and the FA has some interesting details. e.g.: "Some top Taliban leaders, knowing of the NSA�s targeting method, have purposely and randomly distributed SIM cards among their units in order to elude their trackers. �They would do things like go to meetings, take all their SIM cards out, put them in a bag, mix them up, and everybody gets a different SIM card when they leave,� the former drone operator says. �That�s how they confuse us.� " Also I like what Greenwald is doing with "The Intercept", it's him bypassing the main stream media. It's sites like slashdot / soylentnews that will decide if it's a success or not. -- View this thread at http://squte.com/node/4453#comment-10443
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web