Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently |
| Date | 2019-01-27 00:06 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4ptg9.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> (permalink) |
| References | <q2gp9t$j8o$2@neodome.net> <gb2sisF6n6dU1@mid.individual.net> <87bm433u94.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> <t5sp4epf4l93a7o6skeptmag8skojo5vri@dim53.demon.nl> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Kees Nuyt wrote: > On 26 Jan 2019 18:54:15 -0400, Mike Spencer ><mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote: > >> >>Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes: >> >>> On 2019-01-26, !!Credit <payroll@qi3.com> wrote: >>> >>>> How many ad blocks could an ad slinger block if an ad slinger could >>>> block blocks? >>>> >>>> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/01/22/google_chrome_browser_ad_content_block_change/> >>>> >>>> Google engineers have proposed changes to the open-source Chromium >>>> browser that will break content-blocking extensions, including ad >>>> blockers. >>> >>> Get a PiHole. >>> >>> https://pi-hole.net/ >> >> Um, on quick scrut, looks like "Grab our package, auto-install it as a >> great bolus of proprietary code and all will be well." No detailed >> explanation of how it works, no FAQ, no source code. Let pi-hole do >> your DNS? How does that work? How does any of it work? >> >> Not that I use or am likely ever to use Chrome, but I *am* keen on >> eliding crap, bloat & ads from web pages. Doing pretty well with >> Linux and local hacks but it's tedious and error-prone so the digital >> Philosophic Mercury would be nice. Not so much if it's a Black Box from >> the Cloud with a pseudopod inserted into my system. >> >>[groups narrowed to comp.misc] > > Documentation: > https://docs.pi-hole.net/ > Use the hamburger menu top left to access different chapters. > > Open sourse: > https://github.com/pi-hole > > I run it on a Raspberry Pi 3B, never a problem. > You have to be able to instruct your router to tell DHCP clients > to use that Pi as the DNS they should use, or set up DHCP in > Pi-hole. > Nice, kinda looks like the python one(s) that update bind9 (or maybe they borrowed from pihole). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxM9gUACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooFkpwf9H6OtC3RmARdlwySBXvHFhQ3uB5X4l59yMtQS70KCDZEUJxb/ldijxzvX /GChjdM86mGVqZCNyrPCYTaTScAfZy4pNSnZgp7Dk/N9F5dRlLG3SEi2/mGJtBwv 6i01qI04bXcMpChAXzh0DojZNa5NbVX+fxslgRPWf9y8RT/VlcpWqBshbcDpmT0t GkIhS2y/tToYVaSnn5xTMEjPfc0KSHTg8qtMjFzbVesgmWITyA98XE4drkcKZ9HT bIkM4o/YVgnueuwTP57vJSyrm8tlo8FRL0LHIh5h9obc4heEgPAwi2XsJOWuIFmD m+MXZ7s7mz9Q0Uw03h5UcRVOKgj62Q== =lTDZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently "!!Credit" <payroll@qi3.com> - 2019-01-26 04:56 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:54 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently outlook shitemail <microsuck@msn.com> - 2019-01-26 13:14 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-01-26 18:54 -0400
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2019-01-27 00:50 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-27 00:06 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-01-27 19:30 -0400
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-27 11:11 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-01-27 19:25 -0400
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-28 09:25 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-01-28 23:46 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-01 00:25 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-02-01 00:37 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-02-01 00:58 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-01 11:48 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:10 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-02-01 00:54 +0000
Pi-hole (Was: Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-01 11:48 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Juergen Nieveler <Juergen.Nieveler@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 07:59 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-01 11:48 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Doug McIntyre <merlyn@dork.geeks.org> - 2019-02-01 09:00 -0600
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-02-02 02:05 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-17 11:42 -0800
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-02-17 20:24 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2019-02-18 11:27 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-02-18 11:35 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-02-18 21:57 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-02-18 22:33 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-02-18 21:46 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Juergen Nieveler <Juergen.Nieveler@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 17:58 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-01-26 23:15 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-26 23:22 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-01-27 11:09 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Juergen Nieveler <Juergen.Nieveler@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:01 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Juergen Nieveler <Juergen.Nieveler@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 07:56 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:26 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Juergen Nieveler <Juergen.Nieveler@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 15:11 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2019-01-27 19:58 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Juergen Nieveler <Juergen.Nieveler@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 08:03 +0100
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-01-30 22:01 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:34 -0800
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-01-30 23:54 +0000
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 20:33 -0800
Re: Wow, fancy that. Web ad giant Google to block ad-blockers in Chrome. For safety, apparently Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2019-02-20 03:31 +0000
csiph-web