Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Microsoft considered renaming Internet Explorer to escape its checkered past |
| Date | 2014-08-16 19:42 +0000 |
| Organization | My Linux Box |
| Message-ID | <lsoc68$cq4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <PqHmWMkZV4sjx9wBXWu6O0bK@dont-email.me> <lsobd5$er3$2@solani.org> |
RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > On 2014-08-16, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > > Renaming the browser could be seen as a way of breaking from the > > past and distancing the new, actively maintained, > > standards-driven browser from this legacy. The team was asked if > > it had considered such a renaming, and the answer was yes. The > > browser developers didn't completely rule out the possibility > > for the future, either, noting that the discussion was "very > > recent" and asking rhetorically "Who knows what the future holds > > :)" > Interesting article. It would otherwise have some merit, but when > you simply rename a turd, it's still a turd. Very true. Sadly however, for the vast majority of the "computer user population" (i.e., those who have a GeekSquad contract to de-virus-infest their machines once a month), simply changing the name would lead them to believe it is something all new, and not rather the same old turd with a different name. > I strongly believe, however, that the IE brand name is irreparably > tarnished, and frankly Windows is kind of tarnished too. Too many > security issues lead people to worry that with Windows they're > vulnerable in ways they don't understand. Very true, but I wonder how may of the "computer user population" actually understand that the reason why they even need the monthly GeekSquad cleaning is because they are running Windows and/or IE in the first place. Probably a sum total of zero.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Microsoft considered renaming Internet Explorer to escape its checkered past Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-16 06:35 +0000
Re: Microsoft considered renaming Internet Explorer to escape its checkered past RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-16 19:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft considered renaming Internet Explorer to escape its checkered past Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-16 19:42 +0000
csiph-web