Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Randy Westlund <Vorzakir@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Intel's Galileo features Quark: low-power x86 chip |
| Date | 2014-03-10 13:37 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lfkf5t$8b4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lficee$etn$1@solani.org> |
On 2014-03-09, RS Wood wrote: > From the «F00Fed me in the invalid operand» department: > Title: Intel Galileo Review > Author: Rob Zwetsloot > Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:19:04 -0500 > Link: http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/reviews/intel-galileo-review I work with embedded systems. I love that Intel is getting involved in the dev board market, and I especially love the open hardware. I don't think they've found their niche yet, though. As with the Minnowboard, the Galileo seems to have hit the awkward spot between a BeagleBone and an Atom board. Between the BeagleBone Black, an ATMega/Arduino, and a Raspberry Pi, I'm quite content with my current selection. I'm an ARM fan, but not blind to the advantages of x86. If I want x86, though, I'm likely to just go up to an Atom board or other Mini-ITX SBC. Here's hoping Intel keeps pushing open hardware dev boards and manages to either cut their price in half or double their performance. I'm really curious to see what they can do.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Intel's Galileo features Quark: low-power x86 chip RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-09 18:38 +0000 Re: Intel's Galileo features Quark: low-power x86 chip Randy Westlund <Vorzakir@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-10 13:37 +0000
csiph-web