Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private |
| Date | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:29:44 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Lines | 32 |
| Message-ID | <lecf28$g80$3@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <20140222-194019.812.0@Elizabeth-T.xKnuth.news.eternal-september.org> |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1393147784 16640 eJwFwQkBACAIBLBK8h7EAZT+EdxMnHygbq62thn0BqO65B1RjdC4XCxPFu+gkHyak0utb34YtxDg (23 Feb 2014 09:29:44 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:29:44 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQcBACAIBMBKrGfEQdD+EbyDOvuEOdzw8A5AfEs1RPM45bzlyzWlho3K5l52aRmj2v0IXBCg |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:air732VWMYiXYltsA6h2FX4oK9I= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVQEmk4yDR/Uew9z5MOnsFwcDFrRxUjZlkJZSE9T4Y4V+68BfUNsVyybzPAw6iEM0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:757 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2014-02-22, Elizabeth T. Knuth <eknuth@csbsju.edu> wrote: > A federal judge in Minnesota at the district court level threw out three > lawsuits about government employees looking at driver's license > information, in alleged violation of the (federal) Driver's Privacy > Protection Act. His reasoning is apparently: > > 1. Height, weight, eye color, address, etc. is personal but not private. > > 2. Information voluntarily given to third parties has no privacy > protection. > > 3. The plaintiffs failed to show that the government workers did not have > permissible purpose. > > Article in the Minneapolis Star Tribune: > http://www.startribune.com/local/246622531.html > > Discuss. > Well, I'll bite, but it's a lazy bite because it seems like too much work to go research the Federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act. So, we're keeping Slashdot alive here by continuing to refuse to read the F'ing article. Seems like this judge is on shaky ground - this case will go above him close to immediately. And "info given voluntarily to 3rd parties" - WTF? You're not exactly "voluntarily" giving out information if you apply for a driver's license; it's an obligation and a federal requirement. That's some sketchy reasoning. Post this same thing to alt.privacy and watch the place explode. Those guys eat this stuff up.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private "Elizabeth T. Knuth" <eknuth@csbsju.edu> - 2014-02-22 13:40 -0600
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-22 22:07 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-23 09:29 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-23 10:11 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private "Elizabeth T. Knuth" <eknuth@csbsju.edu> - 2014-02-24 01:24 -0600
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private cykros@devio.us - 2014-02-24 19:35 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-24 22:13 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 23:16 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-25 08:58 +0000
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private "Elizabeth T. Knuth" <eknuth@csbsju.edu> - 2014-02-25 20:17 -0600
Re: Judge Says Driver's License Data Not Private Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-27 02:13 +0000
csiph-web