Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back |
| Date | 2014-02-12 22:02 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ldgr1n$4ka$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <20140212140349.b2321509.rsw@therandymon.com> <4d15249a-b266-4bf8-b682-8a23a5b07064@googlegroups.com> <ldgq0j$usn$1@dont-email.me> |
Oregonian Haruspex wrote: > On 2014-02-12 18:36:48 +0000, Koen Lefever said: > >> The protests against SOPA were an exclusively American matter, for the >> obvious reason that it was about a US law. >> >> Yesterday was more of an international affair: the NSA, GCHQ and their >> ilk spy on everybody. >> >> Still, the action did not get the attention it needs. >> >> There was not enough publicity beforehand: if it had not been posted >> the day before here on comp.misc, I would not have even noticed it at >> all. And I am somebody who cares and was involved in >> www.academicsagainstsurveillance.net, so I guess hardly anybody knew >> about it. > > I'd wager that one reason why people didn't notice is that their > favorite web sites weren't doing anything. During the Stop SOPA days, > many web sites like Wikipedia and Reddit were throwing banners up and > reminding people to call their representatives. I didn't see any > evidence of this this time around. > > Another reason may be a combination of feelings of helplessness and > apathy. We Americans have learned that while we can shuffle our > oligarchical class around a bit, nothing really changes. Those that > get voted out retire into high-paying business jobs where their > influence can be put to profitable use, and the new blood has little > hope of even getting on a major ticket unless they have sold their > souls already. With such an obviously corrupt system, what can be > done? So it's back to beer and football, fuck it. And the foreigners? > Pfftt, our government clearly thinks they'd rather have a few pissed > off at the spying, than give up this ability. Merkel got a bit pissy > (rightfully so) but I don't see her doing anything proactive aside from > getting a new phone. > > Academics are maybe against surveillance on principle, but would any > school refuse all the federal grants they get here in the USA? If you > want to take Uncle Sam's money you are also bound to jump when he says > so. > > Let me ask you personally, what lengths are you willing to go to in > order to protect yourself against surveillance? Are you willing to get > rid of your cell phone if you have one? Willing to stop using Google > and Facebook? Willing to stop using main-line operating systems all of > which have undoubtedly been pre- backdoored via National Security > Letter? I'm not asking to be difficult or an asshole, just curious. > > I'm in the process of setting up my own email servers (redundant > geographically distinct systems) and once this is done I intend to cut > the cord with Google completely. I've already mothballed my Facebook > account, after slowly putting up many Facebook profile pictures that > aren't me but look vaguely like me, in order to confuse the facial > recognition profile, I DFE'd everything from Reddit thanks to a handy > Firefox extension, and my web browsing is moving more and more to a TOR > platform - though I don't trust simply because it is a military project > and therefore likely backdoored by default, it will at least stymie > lots of commercial spying. > > I guess my point is that, if I want to be against surveillance, I have > to stop enabling it personally and spread the word because this is all > individuals can really effectively do any more. My cellphone is exclusively for emergency use and has yet to make a single call...prepay with no registration. I use no Google services whatever and have never had a social networking site account...never was willing to accept the privacy loss. I use GNU/Linux and a BSD flavour with no Microsoft or Apple machines in my house. I use a VPN for most of my Internet traffic and Firefox with a number of privacy enhancements as my browser. All in all I don't feel that I've lost anything worth having thanks to these choices and have gained some degree of protection for my privacy and anonymity. BTW my email is from my own site, hosted outside of the UK and in a country that is a lot less willing than most to play ball with the NSA or GCHQ...I host my own proxy there too.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-12 14:03 +0000
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 10:36 -0800
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-12 21:43 +0000
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-12 13:44 -0800
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-12 22:02 +0000
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-12 14:34 -0800
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-12 23:02 +0000
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-12 22:44 -0800
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back Koen Lefever <koen.lefever@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 14:31 -0800
Re: Feb 11: The day the Internet didn't fight back Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 09:27 -0500
csiph-web