Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #17715

Thoughts in combinatorial logic

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Thoughts in combinatorial logic
Date 2019-04-01 16:11 +1100
Message-ID <ggdkraFrb7eU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


As part of a personal project I'm working on, I needed a combinatorial 
logic way of obtaining the lowest set bit from a collection of bits. 
That is, taking n inputs in some order, and by using only and/or/not 
gates, produce n outputs of which only one is set, being that which 
corresponds to the lowest order set input bit

It's not especially difficult.

But suppose the requirement is not the lowest set bit, just any of the 
set bits.

Clearly, the solution to the first requirement is also a solution to the 
second requirement, but is the second requirement amenable to a simpler 
(as in, using fewer gates) solution.

My intuition is that it's not, but I haven't been able to prove it.

Sylvia.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Thoughts in combinatorial logic Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-04-01 16:11 +1100
  Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2019-04-01 16:28 +0300
  Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-04-02 22:08 +0000
    Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-04-03 07:47 +0000
  Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-04-02 23:11 +0100
    Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-04-03 09:34 +1100
  Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-04-05 10:48 +0100
    Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-04-11 20:33 +1000

csiph-web