Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Thoughts in combinatorial logic |
| Date | 2019-04-01 16:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ggdkraFrb7eU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
As part of a personal project I'm working on, I needed a combinatorial logic way of obtaining the lowest set bit from a collection of bits. That is, taking n inputs in some order, and by using only and/or/not gates, produce n outputs of which only one is set, being that which corresponds to the lowest order set input bit It's not especially difficult. But suppose the requirement is not the lowest set bit, just any of the set bits. Clearly, the solution to the first requirement is also a solution to the second requirement, but is the second requirement amenable to a simpler (as in, using fewer gates) solution. My intuition is that it's not, but I haven't been able to prove it. Sylvia.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thoughts in combinatorial logic Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-04-01 16:11 +1100
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2019-04-01 16:28 +0300
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-04-02 22:08 +0000
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-04-03 07:47 +0000
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-04-02 23:11 +0100
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-04-03 09:34 +1100
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-04-05 10:48 +0100
Re: Thoughts in combinatorial logic Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-04-11 20:33 +1000
csiph-web