Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" |
| Date | 2016-01-22 13:54 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dgdjvuFmddmU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <dfo8stFbv96U1@mid.individual.net> <n7r6am$1pa$1@dont-email.me> <dgdahcFk9beU1@mid.individual.net> <n7ru6r$tkt$1@dont-email.me> |
On 22/01/2016 11:47 AM, Rich wrote: > Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >> On 22/01/2016 4:59 AM, Scott Alfter wrote: >>> In article <dfo8stFbv96U1@mid.individual.net>, > >>> What's worse than that, though, is a password field with a length >>> limit (especially an absurdly low limit like 8-12 characters). >>> That they're imposing a length limit on passwords implies that >>> they're storing passwords directly (DANGER WILL ROBINSON!), not >>> hashing them and storing the hashes. I prefer to let KeePass >>> generate 24-32 characters of gibberish to use as a password. > >> I've raised that exact issue with a couple of organisations. Never >> got a response, though. > > If their IT guys are incompetent enough to be storing passwords in a > char(12) or varchar(12) column in their db in the clear, they are > likely also sufficiently tech/security incompetent to understand why > that is a bad thing to be doing. > > Therefore, they simply did not understand your issue, and ignored it. > I think the latter is entirely possible, with the added problem that the person who fields these messages has even less technical understanding, and can't even figure out who to forward it too - hence round file. Sylvia.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Please limit your message to 500 characters" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-14 11:36 +1100
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-01-14 00:57 +0000
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-01-14 01:33 +0000
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-01-14 02:30 +0000
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-01-17 16:39 +0100
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2016-01-18 01:20 +0100
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-13 21:12 -0500
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2016-01-21 17:59 +0000
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-22 11:13 +1100
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-01-22 00:47 +0000
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-22 13:54 +1100
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-22 23:02 +0000
Re: "Please limit your message to 500 characters" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-01-29 10:22 +0100
csiph-web