Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers |
| Date | 2015-03-04 14:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <clnaqiF8l7nU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <LD2v6D2JLwdoW1WFLlQ1PPMv@dont-email.me> <md3cd8$kij$1@speranza.aioe.org> <clktlaFjnr6U1@mid.individual.net> <i88hsb-rj8.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
On 4/03/2015 4:40 AM, Paul Sture wrote: > On 2015-03-03, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >> On 3/03/2015 3:13 PM, Hils wrote: >>> On 02/03/15 23:59, Rich wrote: >>>> Interviewer: Yes, I understand that, but can you give me an idea of how >>>> much experience you have with brown? Roughly. Carpenter: Gosh, I really >>>> don't know. Once they're built I don't care what color they get painted. >>>> Maybe six months? >>> >>> I recently saw a local government recruiter specify that applicants must >>> have a "working knowledge of who colleagues are and what they do". The >>> effect, which is presumably intended, will be to keep the same staff >>> doing the same work but change their job titles. >> >> Or a rather thinly veiled attempt to circumvent a rule requiring that >> external candidates be considered. > > Yes but at least they are being honest. Anyone who doesn't qualify under > those conditions doesn't need to waste their time applying. > > Or they can kick up a stink over the blatant breach of the rules. Sylvia.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-03-02 23:59 +0000
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-02 18:15 -0800
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-03 13:47 +1100
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2015-03-03 04:13 +0000
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-03 16:03 +1100
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-03-03 10:31 +0000
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-03 13:58 +0200
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-04 14:42 +1100
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-04 12:59 +0000
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-04 15:32 +0200
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-04 14:26 +0000
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-05 12:22 +1100
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-03-03 18:40 +0100
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-04 14:00 +1100
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers DD <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2015-03-03 05:12 -0800
Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-03-03 18:34 +0100
csiph-web