Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #6893

Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers
Date 2015-03-04 14:00 +1100
Message-ID <clnaqiF8l7nU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <LD2v6D2JLwdoW1WFLlQ1PPMv@dont-email.me> <md3cd8$kij$1@speranza.aioe.org> <clktlaFjnr6U1@mid.individual.net> <i88hsb-rj8.ln1@news.chingola.ch>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/03/2015 4:40 AM, Paul Sture wrote:
> On 2015-03-03, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>> On 3/03/2015 3:13 PM, Hils wrote:
>>> On 02/03/15 23:59, Rich wrote:
>>>>      Interviewer: Yes, I understand that, but can you give me an idea of how
>>>>      much experience you have with brown? Roughly. Carpenter: Gosh, I really
>>>>      don't know. Once they're built I don't care what color they get painted.
>>>>      Maybe six months?
>>>
>>> I recently saw a local government recruiter specify that applicants must
>>> have a "working knowledge of who colleagues are and what they do". The
>>> effect, which is presumably intended, will be to keep the same staff
>>> doing the same work but change their job titles.
>>
>> Or a rather thinly veiled attempt to circumvent a rule requiring that
>> external candidates be considered.
>
> Yes but at least they are being honest.  Anyone who doesn't qualify under
> those conditions doesn't need to waste their time applying.
>
>
Or they can kick up a stink over the blatant breach of the rules.

Sylvia.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-03-02 23:59 +0000
  Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-02 18:15 -0800
  Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-03 13:47 +1100
  Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2015-03-03 04:13 +0000
    Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-03 16:03 +1100
      Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-03-03 10:31 +0000
      Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-03 13:58 +0200
        Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-04 14:42 +1100
          Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-04 12:59 +0000
            Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-04 15:32 +0200
              Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-03-04 14:26 +0000
                Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-05 12:22 +1100
      Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-03-03 18:40 +0100
        Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-03-04 14:00 +1100
    Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers DD <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2015-03-03 05:12 -0800
    Re: If Carpenters Were Hired Like Programmers Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-03-03 18:34 +0100

csiph-web