Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Google's email scanning |
| Date | 2014-08-05 14:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c4d1ffFgeavU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <lrpnfi$ohr$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Hils wrote: > The company has previously said that it watches for this type of content > by creating a database of ‘hashes’ – unique codes that correspond to > known images of abuse and that allow the company to ‘look’ for abusive > content without examining the image itself or keeping a permanent > database of abusive content. So, the child porn fiends who acquire or distribute such images should make some small change in the image so that the hash is different; if I'm understanding this policing mechanism. There is probably some AI recognition tech afoot which could recognize (or at least suspect) child porn by some logic a little fuzzier than the precision of a hash on a specific and exact image subject to change. -- Mike Easter
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Google's email scanning Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-08-05 05:44 +0100
Re: Google's email scanning Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2014-08-05 14:43 -0700
Re: Google's email scanning Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-06 01:34 +0000
Re: Google's email scanning Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2014-08-07 10:20 -0700
Re: Google's email scanning Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-08 23:12 +0000
Re: Google's email scanning Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2014-08-08 22:19 -0700
Re: Google's email scanning john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-08-19 12:57 -0800
Re: Google's email scanning Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-08-20 08:45 +0000
csiph-web