Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card

From	polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card
Date	2014-06-08 09:19 +0100
Organization	me
Message-ID	<bvikk2F794cU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<ln0ua6$ajo$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/06/2014 07:02, Rich wrote:
> http://pub.gajendra.net/2012/09/hollerith_tyranny
>
>     ...
>
>     "Now fast-forward to the 21st century; a mere couple of thousand
>      years after Caesar. Look at your screen. How wide is your terminal
>      window or the text window of your editor? 80 columns? Yeah, I
>      thought so. Most people's are. And lots of coding standards in lots
>      of organizations mandate this. For example, here is an excerpt from
>      the Linux kernel coding style:"
>
>          "The limit on the length of lines is 80 columns and this is a
>           strongly preferred limit."
>
>          "Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible
>           chunks. Descendants are always substantially shorter than the
>           parent and are placed substantially to the right. The same
>           applies to function headers with a long argument list. Long
>           strings are as well broken into shorter strings. The only
>           exception to this is where exceeding 80 columns significantly
>           increases readability and does not hide information."
>
>     "Granted, the Linux folks give one an escape hatch for when it would
>      be really problematic. But still ask yourself: why? Why 80 columns?
>      Why not 100, or 120, or 60?"
>
>     ...
>
However, when real punched cards were in use, the content was frequently 
limited to 72 or fewer columns due to use of some columns for things 
such as sequence number. Cobol used the 1-6 for a line sequence number, 
7 as a continuation mark, 8-11 for special purposes and 73 - 80 were for 
"program name" or other uses. So 80 editable columns already provides a 
wider area than we used to have.

Also, Hollerith himself appears to have used many different column widths.

The fundamental issue with using wider displays is when people view them 
expecting only 80 columns and miss the extra characters. Or find it 
awkward scrolling their viewer/editor for the exceptions. Or have to 
re-organise their take on windows to allow for the extra width.

-- 
Rod

Thread

The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-06-08 06:02 +0000
  Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-08 10:46 +0300
  Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-06-08 09:19 +0100
  Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-06-08 09:34 +0100
  Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-06-08 14:11 +0100
    Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-06-08 16:44 +0100
      Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-06-08 17:01 +0100
        Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-06-08 16:44 -0300
          Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2014-06-08 20:04 +0000
            Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-06-08 20:20 +0000
              Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-06-09 04:14 +0100
          Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> - 2014-06-09 01:01 -0600
            Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-06-10 15:40 -0300
          Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-06-09 19:17 +0200
        Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-06-09 04:09 +0100
          Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-06-09 10:39 +0100
  Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-06-09 10:15 +0000
    Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-09 13:45 +0300
      Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-06-09 13:38 +0000
  Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card mick <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-13 08:09 +0000
    Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-06-13 09:45 +0100
    Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-06-13 10:18 +0000
      Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-06-13 14:29 +0100
      Re: The Tyranny of the Hollerith Punched Card scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-06-13 21:07 +0000

csiph-web