Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #3311

Re: Is computer security culture simply broken?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Is computer security culture simply broken?
Date 28 May 2014 08:07:50 GMT
Organization Piglet's Pickles & Preserves
Lines 22
Message-ID <buljqmF481pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <llqudr$rrm$1@solani.org> <86edncYTnbtS2RzOnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lls57i$ef3$1@dont-email.me> <budlfvFdpuvU1@mid.individual.net> <llsu37$u2v$4@dont-email.me> <874n0acy2t.fsf@nudel.nodomain.nowhere>
Reply-To usenet@huge.org.uk
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net 7irmYInvx4gg2r5z8kiXWAf+2EprmOEnriI/BFrsEm0O4TZgUU
Cancel-Lock sha1:Dq19kSlt1CvfHhnQ5/12eo5jLtI=
X-No-Archive Yes
User-Agent slrn/pre1.0.0-16 (Linux)
Xref csiph.com comp.misc:3311

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2014-05-28, Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:
>
> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:
>
>> This may be the biggest issue.  Until the ones pushing "get it done
>> yesterday" find the results of such a push causing significant
>> liability, they have no reason to change.
>
> And that person pushing, when hiring the pushees, quite possibly opted
> for people with the minimum skills and/or experience to do the job *as
> (s)he understood it*.  
>
> Uh huh.  And now hurry up and get it done. Yup.

*applause*  Spot on.


-- 
Today is Pungenday, the 2nd day of Confusion in the YOLD 3180
"I do not believe in revealed religion — I will have nothing to do with your
immortality; we are miserable enough in this life, without speculating on
another." Lord Byron, 1778-1824, letter to Rev. Francis Hodgson, 1811

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is computer security culture simply broken? RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-24 20:11 +0000
  Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-24 18:17 -0700
    Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Randy Westlund <Vorzakir@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-25 07:13 +0000
      Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 17:47 +1000
        Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-25 09:10 +0000
          Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 19:23 +1000
            Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-25 12:33 +0100
        Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 14:18 +0000
          Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-05-28 01:43 -0300
            Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-28 08:07 +0000
          Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-28 15:25 +1000
            Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-28 10:02 +0000
              Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-28 20:21 +1000
                Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-28 18:11 +0000
                Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-29 10:39 +0000
      Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 14:12 +0000
        Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-31 10:05 +0200

csiph-web