Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: BASIC is 50 |
| Date | 7 May 2014 11:20:16 GMT |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Lines | 24 |
| Message-ID | <bsuj7gFd631U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ljqg3o$8dh$2@dont-email.me> <5360da8d$0$17144$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <ljr6f8$6mn$1@dont-email.me> <53616180$0$59815$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <gknav.371282$sa2.196137@fx33.am4> |
| Reply-To | usenet@huge.org.uk |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 5arScJAMjtfQfiNfT92oNAQ+92XUFB+lv/eW5N4Ej589Eimu87 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Oa5C+fGBrQ7r1NrSympHbX0GAzo= |
| X-No-Archive | Yes |
| User-Agent | slrn/pre1.0.0-16 (Linux) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:2672 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2014-05-07, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
> "Rich" <rich@example.com> wrote in message
> news:53616180$0$59815$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com...
>> Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> wrote:
>
>> 99.7099999999999999436561815002733055735006928443908691406250000000000000
>>
>> This is why floating point can be dangerous, and why floating point
>> should _NEVER_ ever be used to compute monetary values:
>
> Why not? Because the result might be off by a quadrillionth of a cent?
>
> Use rounding properly and it can be made to work (unless you're dealing with
> very large amounts such as the US debt then it's a bit trickier to avoid
> errors starting to affect the cents).
Pretty obvious you've never worked in finance or banking.
--
Today is Boomtime, the 54th day of Discord in the YOLD 3180
“Stupidity cannot be cured. Stupidity is the only universal capital crime;
the sentence is death. There is no appeal, and execution is carried out
automatically and without pity.”
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-04-30 09:34 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-30 03:42 -0700
Re: BASIC is 50 Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-04-30 10:46 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-04-30 12:03 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-04-30 11:12 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-04-30 15:56 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-04-30 20:41 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-04-30 18:38 -0600
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-01 02:38 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-04-30 22:50 -0600
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-04-30 20:48 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-05-02 09:27 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-02 09:50 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-07 10:48 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-07 10:57 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-07 11:20 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-07 13:14 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-07 16:05 +0300
Re: BASIC is 50 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-08 18:06 +0200
Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-08 20:17 +0300
Re: BASIC is 50 "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 16:08 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-07 18:38 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 19:09 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-07 19:08 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 greymausg@mail.com - 2014-05-08 10:15 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 11:38 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-08 17:55 +0200
Re: BASIC is 50 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-08 17:44 +0200
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-12 12:39 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-12 16:06 +0300
Re: BASIC is 50 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-12 22:48 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-13 12:03 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-13 13:23 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-13 16:22 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-13 19:42 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-13 19:49 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-14 01:09 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-14 09:51 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 bde@besplex.bde.org (Bruce Evans) - 2014-05-14 10:36 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-14 12:58 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 bde@besplex.bde.org (Bruce Evans) - 2014-05-14 16:13 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-14 19:24 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-13 15:50 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-05-01 02:50 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-01 09:06 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-01 09:56 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-01 10:25 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-01 16:43 +0300
Re: BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-01 18:03 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-01 21:35 +0000
Re: BASIC is 50 Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-05-01 22:41 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-02 09:26 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-02 10:46 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-05-02 23:11 +0100
Re: BASIC is 50 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-04-30 17:51 +0300
Re: BASIC is 50 Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:40 +0100
csiph-web