non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...)

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...)
Date	27 Feb 2014 15:44:02 GMT
Lines	13
Message-ID	<bn94q2Fcn96U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<leiuhq$m2h$1@solani.org> <leknvu$4bt$2@news.albasani.net> <lel7bs$vm4$1@solani.org> <lenae7$vph$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net NbMAOck3yc5+6XkcvjjHyAGRWueY7RcyslxBj/ozlIhTL91de7
Cancel-Lock	sha1:1vxww4N6JI4Q9Yt5W1ytVl7J5gw=
User-Agent	PhoNews/1.1.1 (Android)
In-Reply-To	<lenae7$vph$1@news.albasani.net>
Xref	csiph.com comp.misc:1042

Show key headers only | View raw

>> Doesn't always have to be about software.
>
>I agree, but I think posts should relate to computers or computing.  (Or 
>perhaps "mechanized computers and computing" so as to exclude what 
>happens when I add a few numbers up on a used envelope.)

I have thought abut this for a bit and decided I'll try to respect that and
 post this sort of stuff elsewhere.  But those of you who find this topic
 interesting, in which newsgroup shall we agree to send the non-IT articles
 you would equally expect to see on sites like Soy or pipedot?  No point in
 me going to the trouble of posting stuff no one will read. And comments are
 thin enough here as it is!

Thread

Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood  <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-25 20:30 +0000
  Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-25 23:19 +0200
    Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-02-26 09:36 +0000
    Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" SlimmPickens <lachlanmoss@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 02:50 -0800
      Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-26 15:03 +0200
        Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 23:42 +0100
    Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-26 11:24 -0300
  Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:51 +0000
    Re: Fertility procedure risks  designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 11:06 -0600
    Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-26 17:13 +0000
      Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 12:18 +0000
        non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 15:44 +0000
          Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 16:58 +0000
          Re: Fertility procedure risks  designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 11:05 -0600
            Re: Fertility procedure risks  designer babies "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-27 12:22 -0600
            Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:09 +0000
              Re: Fertility procedure risks  designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:39 -0600
                Re: Fertility procedure risks  designer babies RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:50 +0000
              Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-03-01 04:59 -0400
                Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:48 -0500
              Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:43 -0500

csiph-web