Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: X to Close - The origins of the use of [x] in UI design. |
| References | <lsg3g2$q62$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2014-08-14 10:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7zegwj4eym.fsf@example.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Haphazard |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > https://medium.com/solve-for-x/x-to-close-417936dfc0dc > Isn't this an overcomplication? If you write something on a piece of paper, and then decide it is wrong, you cross it out, i.e. put a big X on top of it. I think that predates computers.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
X to Close - The origins of the use of [x] in UI design. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-13 16:24 +0000
Re: X to Close - The origins of the use of [x] in UI design. polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-08-13 19:47 +0100
Re: X to Close - The origins of the use of [x] in UI design. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-13 19:23 +0000
Re: X to Close - The origins of the use of [x] in UI design. polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-08-13 20:54 +0100
Re: X to Close - The origins of the use of [x] in UI design. David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-08-14 10:07 +0100
csiph-web