Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium |
| Date | 2014-07-16 11:32 -0500 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <6450#33712@usenet.squte.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <Qajwv.190124$Im4.130326@fx03.am4> <lpuucv$q18$1@dont-email.me> <6450#33495@usenet.squte.com> <0.3b73f391ee323c8038cf.20140715205152BST.87oawqflif.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <lq44p0$lf5$2@dont-email.me> |
Ben Bacarisse wrote: >So in a way, it works slightly more like usenet. We toss messages out there, >and whether you read it depends upon whether you subscribe to view the group >the message is within yes, that's what I meant. A tweet normally goes out to many people, few of whom answer. Mailing lists and Usenet normally have a few active participants who respond to each other (ie many-to-many) and lots of lurkers, and other email is typically one-one. If I wanted to subscribe to all your emails or posts, regardless of which group you post to, I couldn't. Which might be why Usenet is more topic-based discussions rather than broadcasts of funny pictures. The biggest difference though, is that Twitter has a central server, so they can control all messages, meaning no spam or flame wars. Some people prefer it outside the walled garden, which is why Usenet is still here. Most people prefer convenience to liberty, which is why it's only just still here. There are some attempts [1]to create peer-to-peer replacements for twitter, but I think without some kind of moderation system, they will fail. [1] http://www.wired.com/2014/01/twister/ -- regards ~tdk View this thread at http://squte.com/usenet/twitter-business-model-and-end-freemium?src=u#comment-33712
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-07-12 17:39 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2014-07-12 20:15 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-07-13 00:05 +0100
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium G Skinner <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-07-13 21:40 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-07-14 04:21 -0500
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-15 20:51 +0100
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-07-15 21:00 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-07-15 21:09 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-07-17 12:46 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-07-17 14:33 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-07-17 16:06 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-07-17 13:55 -0400
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-15 23:59 +0100
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-07-16 11:32 -0500
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-07-16 18:02 +0000
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-07-16 19:29 +0100
Re: Twitter Business Model and the End of Freemium "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-07-17 07:17 -0500
csiph-web