Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: The State of ZFS on Linux |
| Date | 2014-09-12 12:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20140912125647.e1c936f3.rsw@therandymon.com> (permalink) |
| References | <BUS1mdOVMj/65rJ08aVmKcyD@dont-email.me> <20140912113617.b21b9314.rsw@therandymon.com> <luuns6$uhd$1@dont-email.me> |
> I used to be a btrfs fan. > > Then it borked itself, twice, on a small array (about 3T). > > Then it borked itself on a single drive desktop system (120G laptop > drive) for no clear reason at all. > > Afterwhich I decided to: 1) pay much more attention to the "warning, > experimental" tag, 2) switch back to ext4 and wait a _very_ long time > before trying btrfs again. Wow, sorry to hear that; that's bad news. By the way, have you ever noticed how visually similar the words 'btrfs' and 'barfs' are? I think it's pertinent: if you're not careful, it's the file system that might just barf on you. :)
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The State of ZFS on Linux Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 22:08 +0000
Re: The State of ZFS on Linux RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-12 11:36 +0000
Re: The State of ZFS on Linux Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-12 12:10 +0000
Re: The State of ZFS on Linux RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-12 12:56 +0000
Re: The State of ZFS on Linux Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-09-12 16:02 +0300
Re: The State of ZFS on Linux Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-12 16:17 +0000
csiph-web