Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD |
| Date | 2025-12-20 15:20 -0500 |
| Organization | Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) |
| Message-ID | <10i70dk$icf$1@panix2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10i2v4d$103pu$1@dont-email.me> <wZl*bXuuA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: >The thing is, that's talking about the base system. All the stuff with >display managers and packages and so on aren't the base system. That's more >like the random stuff you bought on Amazon to bolt on to your car - the >manufacturer does not have any say in their engineering or making them work >well together. Indeed. And gnome is pretty precarious under Linux in spite of a huge amount of effort being expended on it. It's fine if you want everything completely default, but if you want any changes then things start going wrong. And if they didn't go wrong today, they will tomorrow when you install the mandatory update because the way you make that change is different now. >If you can stay within the base system (or a few limited services on top of >it) you'll be ok. If you stray off-piste into too much third party stuff >it's only as good as the third party makes it - and often that third party >is not interested in FreeBSD. BSD pretty much follows the Unix philosophy of making everything as modular as possible, and using human-readable text files for everything. Linux on the other hand has become very bloated and very non-modular in recent years. A lot of Linux distributions seem to expect that people will use the gui for everything, and BSD treats the gui as kind of an afterthought, which I think is a good thing. >FreeBSD derives from BSD which derived from AT&T Unix. There's no longer >any AT&T code in it. Linux is a clean sheet reimplementation. Arguably >both have diverged from AT&T's source code, but BSD was a piecemeal >replacement so kept the original structure and feel while Linux started from >scratch. This is true, and the argument can be made that Linux has devolved very far from the Unix philosophy, while the BSD variants have mostly kept to the Unix philosophy. As a long-time proponent of the Unix philosophy ever since I was forced to leave RSX-11 for v7, this makes me much more of a BSD fan than a Linux fan. Most often I pick the OS for the applications... and when the applications I want to use are the Software Tools kit as they most often are, I will prefer BSD. This is not always the case, though. >If your stack is Kubenetes + Docker + systemd, agreed. If your stack is >plain nginx + DB then FreeBSD is still an contender. Albeit an increasingly >niche one as everyone moves towards the former. There is nothing more horrible and hellish that I could imagine than being wrapped up inside Kubernetes + Docker + systemd. I agree that everyone is moving in that direction and as someone who cares about computers actually being reliable I find this terrifying. >It sounds like the writer took some memes and ran with them, without >actually knowing too much about what people do for real nowadays. What people do for real is mostly wait for updates. And then waste time fixing things that the updates broke. Actually get work done with computers? That's not in the requirements definition anymore. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
“Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-19 07:33 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-12-19 11:03 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-19 21:19 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-12-20 17:40 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-20 22:47 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-12-20 15:20 -0500
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-20 22:33 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2025-12-19 13:32 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-19 21:09 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2025-12-22 13:38 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 21:21 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2025-12-23 13:38 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-23 20:31 +0000
Solaris (was: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2025-12-24 13:18 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-01-14 11:29 +0200
ZFS on Linux (was: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2026-01-14 14:00 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-01-14 15:29 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-01-21 14:31 +0200
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-01-22 14:14 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2026-01-22 18:51 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-22 20:46 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Ian <${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-if-you-must}@jusme.com> - 2026-01-23 08:13 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-23 20:51 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Ian <${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-if-you-must}@jusme.com> - 2026-01-24 08:49 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-24 21:27 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Ian <${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-if-you-must}@jusme.com> - 2026-01-25 08:50 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-25 18:56 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-01-23 12:25 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-01-25 11:02 +0100
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-25 18:56 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-01-28 19:25 +0100
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-01-24 10:46 -0500
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-01-26 23:10 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-01-27 19:03 -0500
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-01-28 13:23 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-01-28 11:58 -0500
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-05 22:50 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-06 09:42 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2026-01-06 14:08 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-06 22:59 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2026-01-07 06:41 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-06 06:14 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-07 03:55 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-21 00:11 +0000
Re: ???Rock-Solid??? FreeBSD Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-02-21 19:09 +0000
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-02-21 15:39 -0500
Re: “Rock-Solid” FreeBSD Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-21 21:31 +0000
csiph-web