Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #82267 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-12-10 00:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-12-10 00:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-12-10 00:13 -0700
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-12-10 00:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nested loops is strangely slow, totally at a loss. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16799.1418195682.18130.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you sure it isn't? Your 'space' is an iterable cubic > cross-product. Your first loop checks (0,0,0) which is the first > element returned, and is thus fast... but it also *consumes* that > first element. The next time you test it, the entire space gets > consumed, looking for another (0,0,0), which won't exist. That means > iterating over 580**3 == 195112000 (two hundred million) tuples, and > that *is* going to be slow. Huh, I wasn't even aware that membership tests worked on iterables with no __contains__ method. Seems odd to me that 'x in y' should be supported but not 'len(y)'.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web