Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #81106 > unrolled thread

Python IDE.

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

Contents

  Python IDE. dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com - 2014-11-20 11:01 -0800
    Re: Python IDE. Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 14:09 -0500
      Re: Python IDE. dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com - 2014-11-20 11:19 -0800
        Re: Python IDE. Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2014-11-20 20:29 +0100
          Re: Python IDE. TP <wingusr@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 13:47 -0800
          Re: Python IDE. Ricardo Aráoz <ricaraoz@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 19:27 -0300
        Re: Python IDE. alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-20 19:34 +0000
    Re: Python IDE. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 12:34 -0700
    RE: Python IDE. "Clayton Kirkwood" <crk@godblessthe.us> - 2014-11-20 11:34 -0800
    Re: Python IDE. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-11-20 23:11 +0000
    Re: Python IDE. Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-21 10:13 +1100
      Re: Python IDE. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 11:22 +1100
    Re: Python IDE. Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-11-20 21:54 -0500
    Re: Python IDE. Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-11-20 21:13 -0600
    Re: Python IDE. kiloran <kiloran.public@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 23:37 +0000
      Python-friendly IDE (was: Python IDE.) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-11-22 11:17 +1100

#81106 — Python IDE.

Can someone suggest a good python IDE. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#81109

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:01 PM,  <dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone suggest a good python IDE.

PyCharm, but it's not free.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81111

On Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:09:24 PM UTC-5, Larry....@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:01 PM,  <dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can someone suggest a good python IDE.
> 
> PyCharm, but it's not free.

If you can tell me a free one, that will be great. 

I was looking at the following document, which states different IDE's.

http://www.linuxcandy.com/2012/07/which-python-ide-is-best-choose-your-own.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81112

On 20-11-2014 20:19, dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:09:24 PM UTC-5, Larry....@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:01 PM,  <dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can someone suggest a good python IDE.
>>
>> PyCharm, but it's not free.
> 
> If you can tell me a free one, that will be great. 
> 
> I was looking at the following document, which states different IDE's.
> 
> http://www.linuxcandy.com/2012/07/which-python-ide-is-best-choose-your-own.html
> 

PyCharm *is* free, if you fall in one of several categories.
See http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/buy/license-matrix.jsp

Even when you have to buy it, it is cheap (IMO) for what it offers.


Irmen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81132

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl>
wrote:

> PyCharm *is* free, if you fall in one of several categories.
> See http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/buy/license-matrix.jsp
>
> Even when you have to buy it, it is cheap (IMO) for what it offers.
>

"PyCharm Editions Comparison" [1] is a better comparison between the
differences of the always free Community Edition and the Pro Edition of
PyCharm.

[1] https://www.
jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81348

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Spyder

El 20/11/14 a las 18:47, TP escibió:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Irmen de Jong 
> <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl <mailto:irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl>> wrote:
>
>     PyCharm *is* free, if you fall in one of several categories.
>     See http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/buy/license-matrix.jsp
>
>     Even when you have to buy it, it is cheap (IMO) for what it offers.
>
>
> "PyCharm Editions Comparison" [1] is a better comparison between the 
> differences of the always free Community Edition and the Pro Edition 
> of PyCharm.
>
> [1] 
> https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html 
> <http://jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html>
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81113

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:19:23 -0800, dvenkatj2eedev wrote:

> On Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:09:24 PM UTC-5, Larry....@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:01 PM,  <dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Can someone suggest a good python IDE.
>> 
>> PyCharm, but it's not free.
> 
> If you can tell me a free one, that will be great.
> 
> I was looking at the following document, which states different IDE's.
> 
> http://www.linuxcandy.com/2012/07/which-python-ide-is-best-choose-your-
own.html

lotts of good options there.
try one see how you feel & if it dosn't suit try another

btw it would help if you specified your os although may are available for 
most platforms



-- 
The man who raises a fist has run out of ideas.
		-- H.G. Wells, "Time After Time"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81114

On 11/20/2014 12:01 PM, dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com wrote:
> Can someone suggest a good python IDE. 

I'm sure Google can reveal many options and opinions on the matter.

Personally I don't find IDEs that useful with Python.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81116

Community edition is free but with limited capability, although you will be
hard pressed to find a limiting factor especially for general programming.
All of the bells and whistles can be found in the sold product. Also, the
student/teacher edition is available, and in fact a new version came out
today. It is somewhere between pro and community I think.

Clayton


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Python-list [mailto:python-list-
>bounces+crk=godblessthe.us@python.org] On Behalf Of Larry Martell
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:09 AM
>To: python-list@python.org
>Subject: Re: Python IDE.
>
>On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:01 PM,  <dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can someone suggest a good python IDE.
>
>PyCharm, but it's not free.
>--
>https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81139

On 2014-11-20, dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com <dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can someone suggest a good python IDE. 

Sure: emacs, bash, grep, et alia.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Hello?  Enema Bondage?
                                  at               I'm calling because I want
                              gmail.com            to be happy, I guess ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81140

dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com wrote:

> Can someone suggest a good python IDE.

Yes. Use a UNIX or Linux system:

http://blog.sanctum.geek.nz/series/unix-as-ide/




-- 
Steven

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81152

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Can someone suggest a good python IDE.
>
> Yes. Use a UNIX or Linux system:
>
> http://blog.sanctum.geek.nz/series/unix-as-ide/

My IDE is Xfce, with a bunch of plugins called SciTE, Google Chrome,
xfce4-terminal, Gypsum, and VLC. It's the best IDE in the world... how
many pay-for Python IDEs have a built-in feature for playing "Let It
Go" in Polish (with subtitles and translation) while you work? Because
that's what's playing right now...

ChrisA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81160

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:01:56 -0800 (PST), dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com
declaimed the following:

>Can someone suggest a good python IDE. 

	Well, I've been perfectly happy with PythonWin -- which is part of the
Windows builds from ActiveState.

	The "default" Idle has never gotten my favor -- it just comes across as
clunky to me. I'd rather install SciTE than use Idle.

	If I had to... VIM in one window for editing, and a bare command line
for test execution in another (I'm sure VIM probably has a way to invoke a
command line, but I never used the Vi clones enough to get much beyond:
yank, put, open, find/replace, :zz )


-- 
	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
    wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81163

On 2014-11-20 21:54, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> VIM in one window for editing, and a bare command line for test
> execution in another (I'm sure VIM probably has a way to invoke a
> command line,

It can be done, but (without an unofficial patch) it's modal, so most
of us vi/vim users prefer to host the whole deal in tmux or
GNU-screen, with vi/vim in one window and the terminal(s) in other
window(s).

-tkc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81255

On 20/11/2014 19:01, dvenkatj2eedev@gmail.com wrote:
> Can someone suggest a good python IDE.
>
I'm very happy with Eclipse

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81257 — Python-friendly IDE (was: Python IDE.)

kiloran <kiloran.public@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm very happy with Eclipse

Eclipse has many benefits:

* It is not Python-specific. I consider it a grave mistake to invest a
  lot of effort in learning a Python-specific development environment,
  when there are plenty of good environments that do not tie you
  especially to one language.

* It respects software freedom, i.e. it is licensed as free software
  <URL:https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html>. This has many
  benefits <URL:https://fsfe.org/about/basics/freesoftware.en.html>.

* Because it is free software, any motivated programmer (not only the
  vendor) can adapt it for any platform, so as a result it runs fine on
  every major desktop platform today.

* Because it is free software, the user community (not only the vendor)
  can direct how it meets their needs, and there is a thriving ecosystem
  of plug-ins to adapt it to various workflows.

* Because it is free software, your investment spent learning to use it
  will not become worthless when the vendor loses interest in
  maintaining it.

* Because it is free software, the user community is free to set up an
  ecosystem that works with it, and they have: the Eclipse Marketplace
  <URL:https://marketplace.eclipse.org/>.

* Because it is free software with a thriving community, there are many
  resources available for putting it to work with popular languages like
  Python:

  * PyDev <URL:http://pydev.org/> makes Eclipse into a Python IDE.

  * Lars Vogel maintains a tutorial for driving Eclipse and PyDev
    <URL:http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/Python/article.html>.

  * Version control integration, using either Mercurial
    <URL:http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MercurialEclipse>
    or Git <URL:https://www.eclipse.org/egit/>.

  * and more: build system integration, unit testing integration, code
    refactoring, packaging, etc.

I don't actually use Eclipse (Unix is my IDE). But the fact that it's
free software with a thriving user-community-driven ecosystem makes me
very glad it exists.

For a counterpoint, with much discussion of the downsides, see
<URL:https://wiki.python.org/moin/EclipsePythonIntegration>.

-- 
 \     “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do |
  `\        it from religious conviction.” —Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), |
_o__)                                                   Pensées, #894. |
Ben Finney

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web