Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80812 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-11-15 17:29 +1100 |
| Last post | 2014-11-15 17:29 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Efficient Threading Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-11-15 17:29 +1100
| From | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-15 17:29 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Efficient Threading |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15846.1416032993.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 14Nov2014 18:42, Empty Account <emptya45@gmail.com> wrote: >I am thinking about writing a load test tool in Python, so I am interested >in how I can create the most concurrent threads/processes with the fewest >OS resources. I would imagine that I/O would need to be non-blocking. > >There are a number of options including standard library threading, gevent, >stackless python, cython parallelism etc. Because I am new to Python, I am >unsure on which libraries to choose. I am not really bothered on the tool >chain, just as long as it is Python related (so I'd use PyPy for example). The locust.io load test tool uses gevent and seems to like it. I do not know enough to make a recommendation myself, but I believe they use it for the same reasons you have. Cheers, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> Whatever is not nailed down is mine. What I can pry loose is not nailed down. - Collis P. Huntingdon
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web