Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80219 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-11-04 13:06 -0600 |
| Last post | 2014-11-04 13:06 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-04 13:06 -0600
| From | Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-04 13:06 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: [Python-Dev] Dinamically set __call__ method |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15464.1415127972.18130.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Roberto Martínez <robertomartinezp@gmail.com
> wrote:
> The workaround of calling a different method inside __call__ is not valid
> for my case because I want to change the *signature* of the function also
> -for introspection reasons.
You could define __call__ like so:
def __call__(self, *args, **kwds):
self._my_call(*args, **kwds)
then set self._my_call at runtime.
Skip
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web