Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #79282 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-10-19 12:23 +1100 |
| Last post | 2014-10-19 12:23 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Flush stdin Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-19 12:23 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-19 12:23 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Flush stdin |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14976.1413681789.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Empty Account <emptya45@gmail.com> wrote: > I am using netcat to listen to a port and python to read stdin and print to > the console. > > nc -l 2003 | python print_metrics.py After lengthy discussion about what it means to flush stdin, I think it's high time someone asked the question: Why not skip nc altogether, and have your Python program do its own socket work? Then you don't have to worry about stream flushing at all. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web