Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #79070 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-10-13 16:08 -0600 |
| Last post | 2014-10-13 16:08 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Flask and Django Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-10-13 16:08 -0600
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-13 16:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Flask and Django |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14836.1413238129.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 10/10/2014 04:22 PM, Juan Christian wrote: > Maybe that's because I feel the Django doc a bit confuse, I tried reading > (and practicing!) tutorials, official doc, books, and so on, but I can't > quite understand the whole thing. > > Is Flask really underestimated? Can you guys mention "big name" companies > or people using it? Does it have real value in real world business? Nothing wrong with using Flask, especially for a personal project, or even something commercial. That said, Django is pretty easy to get started with. I have done very little web development ever, and I can fairly easily get going with Django. The tutorials are quite good. If you have problems with them, you can get help on the django mailing lists and forums, I am sure. Django does seem to get a lot of attention. It's getting to be a huge framework, with lots of bells and whistles, but I'm pretty sure you can still use as much or as little of it as you need, and even discard parts of it, such as the native Django database persistance API, and use, say, sqalchemy.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web