Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #79070 > unrolled thread

Re: Flask and Django

Started byMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
First post2014-10-13 16:08 -0600
Last post2014-10-13 16:08 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Flask and Django Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-10-13 16:08 -0600

#79070 — Re: Flask and Django

FromMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Date2014-10-13 16:08 -0600
SubjectRe: Flask and Django
Message-ID<mailman.14836.1413238129.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 10/10/2014 04:22 PM, Juan Christian wrote:
> Maybe that's because I feel the Django doc a bit confuse, I tried reading
> (and practicing!) tutorials, official doc, books, and so on, but I can't
> quite understand the whole thing.
> 
> Is Flask really underestimated? Can you guys mention "big name" companies
> or people using it? Does it have real value in real world business?

Nothing wrong with using Flask, especially for a personal project, or
even something commercial.

That said, Django is pretty easy to get started with.  I have done very
little web development ever, and I can fairly easily get going with
Django.  The tutorials are quite good.  If you have problems with them,
you can get help on the django mailing lists and forums, I am sure.
Django does seem to get a lot of attention.  It's getting to be a huge
framework, with lots of bells and whistles, but I'm pretty sure you can
still use as much or as little of it as you need, and even discard parts
of it, such as the native Django database persistance API, and use, say,
sqalchemy.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web