Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #79781
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: id == vs is |
| Date | 2014-10-27 09:17 -0400 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-53C705.09170427102014@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <544D94B5.80502@mrabarnett.plus.com> <mailman.15221.1414379336.18130.python-list@python.org> |
In article <mailman.15221.1414379336.18130.python-list@python.org>, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: > The "is" test is more direct and less subject to iffiness because the longer > expression using id() leaves more scope/time for things to change, and of > course "id" itself can be rebound to something weird. Not to mention that Python is case-sensitive and in the code as presented by the OP: >>>>Id(x) == id(y) those are two different functions :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: id == vs is Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-10-27 13:36 +1100 Re: id == vs is Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-10-27 09:17 -0400
csiph-web