Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #82467

Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone04.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone04.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <mateusz@loskot.net>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.010
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'attribute': 0.07; 'mentioned,': 0.07; 'method.': 0.07; 'style.': 0.09; 'subject:method': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; "wouldn't": 0.14; 'changes': 0.15; 'agreed,': 0.16; 'assignment.': 0.16; 'attribute,': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'foo()': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'instance,': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'pass': 0.26; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'related': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'class': 0.32; 'received:209.85.212': 0.32; 'cases': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.33; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'december': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; '12,': 0.39; 'new': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'between': 0.67; 'obvious': 0.74; 'capture': 0.91; 'subject:skip:w 20': 0.91
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bwoPDOS06UU5/IJD1JCYnaU5u1qZT2LL9zYm1yOQIkw=; b=IECFR9T3foBuhkfL3MmDATZcPKq2JZR+insFd051pyfygvedLy8Cu6KLtOQpqUySe6 WqCxvGZngDIzsta/v4eaTTQARbr5J2eiebU2HOGkKhU8cg7r2c1ZaeFMaZ1cfWzmtI/X wYUGoLOzxy2Satv/JvyrbHwGFG0PjOerfR7T3AOp1JvIMzOAlYo83BeE5YkpHFZ3jirc YaGmNbUn+DzV2luucOaLtaphWxfKtUVS9MQqtZc23NCnFaggBSmSiiLjNZdSxGHEVnT8 q7q+PXD38j/SuVgzASWwUkqn1ueZP3j0FkIXdek5ePNSaQfMvkoYc2Tcu/DMFZ1wIxwV bsog==
X-Gm-Message-State ALoCoQkZvyXUBJhuxdR4QCTcUeHHi96cD5iJHtRmtXHD8CKjTWkpHdP54sfxNY23BvKG4YQjTmH0
X-Received by 10.180.99.163 with SMTP id er3mr10931600wib.18.1418418236253; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:03:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Originating-IP [46.28.50.100]
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmpOX2pEgJM7AgOWeOge5+H=QNUd2KH9nKC34PBVJSDUYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References <CABUeae-rNeN_dGgkgauNr+-qChXvkgenBmgLbFioe+JDqiT+Hg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmojWeyB_bv-6Rjzkno6Cb7NiUKo7rt4Th6fvNPOsGv_jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABUeae9ukrw8iYan+iFj_6-V7LT0MVm+heVDWv7zEkqEAMim+g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpOX2pEgJM7AgOWeOge5+H=QNUd2KH9nKC34PBVJSDUYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net>
Date Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:03:26 +0100
Subject Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property?
To Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.16927.1418418244.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 27
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1418418244 news.xs4all.nl 2948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53745
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes 4613
X-Received-Body-CRC 1762906339
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:82467

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12 December 2014 at 12:26, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> wrote:
>> I've got several cases which are not obvious to me.
>> For instance, class Foo has a boolean attribute, read-write,
>> which I see a couple of realisations for possible:
>>
>
> 0) Attribute only.
>
> class Foo:
>     pass
>
> Foo().default = True
>
> Unless you need something more than this, go with this style. Much simpler.


Agreed, in general, but if the question was related to such simple case,
I wouldn't bother asking it.

I mentioned, setting the new value involves more changes to Foo()
instance, so i's not possible to capture it with just an assignment.
Hence, the discussion between property vs method.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property? Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> - 2014-12-12 22:03 +0100
  Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-12-13 22:24 +1100
    Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property? Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> - 2014-12-15 10:56 +0100

csiph-web