Groups > comp.lang.python > #82078

Re: Tuple of lists concatenation - function vs comprehension

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'explicit': 0.07; 'none,': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.09; 'jan': 0.12; '2],': 0.16; '[none,': 0.16; 'ivan': 0.16; 'none]': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'see,': 0.30; '>>>>': 0.31; 'style': 0.33; 'subject:lists': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; "i'll": 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'itself': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'expression': 0.60; 'kind': 0.63; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'received:108': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: Tuple of lists concatenation - function vs comprehension
Date	Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:21:37 -0500
References	<001a01d0122f$86b95480$942bfd80$@gmail.com> <20141207151749.GB32773@FuzzyHorror> <001b01d01232$77700840$665018c0$@gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-108-16-203-145.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To	<001b01d01232$77700840$665018c0$@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.16687.1417990918.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	23
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1417990918 news.xs4all.nl 2900 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40610
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:82078

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/7/2014 10:28 AM, Ivan Evstegneev wrote:
> Hi Shiyao,
>
> Now I see, that it was kind of dumb question...
>
>>>>> x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
>>>>> L = []
>>>> [L.extend(i) for i in x]
> [None, None, None]

Using a list comprehension for the expression side-effect, when you do 
not actually want the list produced by the comprehension, is considered 
bad style by many.  There is nothing wrong with explicit loops.

> BUT when I check L itself I'll see this one
>
>>>> L
> [1,2,3,5,6]

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Tuple of lists concatenation  -  function vs comprehension Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-12-07 17:21 -0500
  Re: Tuple of lists concatenation  -  function vs comprehension Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-12-09 06:16 -0800

csiph-web