Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #81656
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <torriem+gmail@torriefamily.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.014 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'subject: + ': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'worked,': 0.09; 'thread': 0.14; 'aborted': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'scope.': 0.16; 'subject:analysis': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'users.': 0.18; 'work,': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'subject:/': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'went': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'problem': 0.35; 'done.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'minutes,': 0.36; 'right?': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'christian': 0.38; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'message- id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'users': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'subject:Fwd': 0.61; 'real': 0.63; 'soon': 0.63 |
| X-Virus-Scanned | amavisd-new at torriefamily.org |
| Date | Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:54:41 -0700 |
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: Fwd: Python Signal/Slot + QThred code analysis |
| References | <CAAp0bGttki1B=1q5SX_C39L_dRB22YOQiTbVxdvo4jSee0srcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAp0bGsgMTK7MS1Wvh13304et7Bb7XUyfZTU8ZmF2++BuLj7dw@mail.gmail.com> <5473E188.5020608@gmail.com> <CAAp0bGtYCEWNLV7tnR6O5N706_3AkO9XRBs1pNP8TCxfctUyow@mail.gmail.com> <5474A333.2090207@mrabarnett.plus.com> <CAAp0bGsGLsWoXQnqFYN3KLeUsmcD5ujF80sasM16wx70zQ1xUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAp0bGvhhWcLO76UQ+nXZuhazjJr9wsjwBkuCX78O4K=em9wuQ@mail.gmail.com> <5474C889.5090503@mrabarnett.plus.com> <CAAp0bGtv13QaPhfTx+tzSe6ZpQ9RCLiWrG1Cv+qfEw3JZ41o9g@mail.gmail.com> <547545CF.60208@gmail.com> <CAAp0bGuMRmEXXFpHaVx0MBoQ72N3MYXYwnnxpS58w-LSV6vTdw@mail.gmail.com> <5476A134.7050407@gmail.com> <5476A48C.1050607@gmail.com> <CAAp0bGtirGVFRAdE3-eosTVfwTAeLO0-XcPyY7+JVSsujqs7bg@mail.gmail.com> <5477AB1E.3030609@gmail.com> <CAAp0bGvR+AUiedDdw6KLTmBjJ-PSKvxEnwCxbRj7xB7isFEvMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAp0bGvypnRutp5MmRV6sOu2iU267TbB-yeyteUN9kH6twVKKw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <CAAp0bGvypnRutp5MmRV6sOu2iU267TbB-yeyteUN9kH6twVKKw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16387.1417136088.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 12 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1417136088 news.xs4all.nl 2905 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44309 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:81656 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 11/27/2014 04:29 PM, Juan Christian wrote: > Is that right? But I don't think that always calling the site this way is > good for them and for me, sometimes I may not get new users for like 10~15 > minutes, so I would have wasted a lot of calls for nothing. That's why I > only instantiate/call the site when I get new users. So the real problem with instantiating a worker thread for every request is that you have to hold onto a reference to the worker long enough for the work to be done. Your original code was not doing this, so had it worked, the thread would have been aborted before it even started its work, as soon as the worker instance went out of scope.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Fwd: Python Signal/Slot + QThred code analysis Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 17:54 -0700
csiph-web