Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'binary': 0.07; 'reject': 0.07; 'subject:bug': 0.07; '3.0,': 0.09; 'accepted,': 0.09; 'ascii': 0.09; 'interpreted': 0.09; 'mixed': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subset': 0.09; 'thus,': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; 'check.': 0.16; 'likewise': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'renamed': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'seems': 0.21; 'accepted.': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'bytes': 0.24; 'unicode': 0.24; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'could': 0.34; 'convert': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'short': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'believe': 0.68; 'other.': 0.75; '10:32': 0.84; '2.7.': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'universally': 0.84; 'continue.': 0.91; 'received:108': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport?
Date	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:16:21 -0500
References	<1b49aa55-ba5f-4e70-8ddb-ae5dea3a40da@googlegroups.com> <1417010748.2940071.195658861.2859C26B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAPTjJmo8KbZbk4etqMqvOqrAN6p3J7cQDhdoMPTBysQWfbxOuw@mail.gmail.com> <1417015925.2961473.195688745.6F0FC175@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-108-16-203-145.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To	<1417015925.2961473.195688745.6F0FC175@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.16354.1417036626.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	19
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1417036626 news.xs4all.nl 2972 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58530
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:81610

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/26/2014 10:32 AM, random832@fastmail.us wrote:

> It seems like if it is a bug to reject long where int is accepted,

I do not believe that is universally true is 2.7.  But even if it is...
Short ints were, value-wise, a subset of longs.  Thus, for example, 
binary operations could always convert the int to long and continue.  In 
3.0, short ints were removed and long renamed int.

> should be likewise considered a bug to reject ASCII-only unicode where
> str is accepted.

That would require an O(n) check.  Bytes and unicode have an ascii 
overlap when bytes are interpreted as ascii chars, but neither is a 
subset of the other.  Mixed binary operations were removed in 3.x.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com> - 2014-11-26 03:29 -0800
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-11-26 09:05 -0500
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 01:40 +1100
    Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com> - 2014-11-26 07:14 -0800
      Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 02:17 +1100
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-11-26 10:32 -0500
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 02:46 +1100
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-26 08:58 -0800
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-11-26 16:16 -0500

csiph-web