Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #81143
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'deny': 0.07; 'suggestions,': 0.07; 'corrections': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'suggest': 0.14; 'wrote': 0.14; 'language.': 0.14; '_do_': 0.16; 'docs.': 0.16; 'garbage': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'semantics': 0.16; 'stupidity': 0.16; 'syntactical': 0.16; 'targets': 0.16; 'student': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "aren't": 0.24; 'tracker': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'too.': 0.31; 'bad.': 0.31; 'helpful.': 0.31; "user's": 0.31; '"the': 0.34; 'sense': 0.34; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'knows': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'programming,': 0.36; 'subject:skip:d 10': 0.36; 'question,': 0.38; 'somebody': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'matter': 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'valuable': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'telling': 0.64; 'relatively': 0.65; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'capable': 0.67; 'subject': 0.69; 'user,': 0.69; 'lack': 0.78; 'pony': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: Python docs disappointing |
| Date | Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:22:08 +0000 |
| References | <h4vj45$5hl$1@reader1.panix.com> <77d357fb-342e-4856-814d-0e0003164fb1@googlegroups.com> <m4lscv$nr7$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | host-92-18-14-177.as13285.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <m4lscv$nr7$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16064.1416525904.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 44 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1416525904 news.xs4all.nl 2861 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53435 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:81143 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 20/11/2014 23:10, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2014-11-20, jstnms123@gmail.com <jstnms123@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I write this to address the criticism which targets a user's lack of >> responsibility for the real/implied/insinuated failings of the docs. >> As a relatively inexperienced student of programming, I am not in any >> position to contribute/edit the documents. > > Wrong. As an inexperienced user, you are _exactly_ the right person > to contribute/edit the documents. A documents _always_ make sense to > the author and to somebody who already knows the information. They > are often not capable of seeing what's wrong. > > It's those who are _not_ familiar with the subject matter who can > often make the most valuable contributions. > >> THAT DOES NOT, however, DENY THE CATEGORICAL STUPIDITY OF THE >> DOCUMENTATION: . Not only are the semantics of the editors in >> question, but so are the syntactical and grammatical conventions, >> too. > > Then send in suggestions, corrections and improvements. Or pony up > and actually take over maintenance of one of the documents you think > is so bad. > > The authors of the documentation aren't _intentionally_ writing things > that other people don't understand. If you don't understand the > documentation or think it needs to be extended/expanded, then help > _do_ it. > > Just telling somebody "the document you wrote SUCKS!" is not even a > _tiny_ bit helpful. > Having seen some of the garbage that turns up on the bug tracker under the guise of "improvements" I suggest that many people who criticize the docs don't take up a career as a technical author. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python docs disappointing jstnms123@gmail.com - 2014-11-20 07:54 -0800
Re: Python docs disappointing Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 11:51 -0500
Re: Python docs disappointing albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-04 10:27 +0000
Re: Python docs disappointing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-04 21:37 +1100
Re: Python docs disappointing Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-12-04 22:46 +1100
Re: Python docs disappointing jtan <admin@grails.asia> - 2014-12-05 07:33 +0800
Re: Python docs disappointing Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-12-04 16:57 -0700
Re: Python docs disappointing Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 09:51 -0700
Re: Python docs disappointing Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 11:18 -0600
Re: Python docs disappointing Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-11-20 23:10 +0000
Re: Python docs disappointing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-11-20 23:22 +0000
Re: Python docs disappointing Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-21 10:29 +1100
Re: Python docs disappointing Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-11-21 16:35 +0000
csiph-web