Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #80988

Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <drsalists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'broken': 0.04; 'feedback.': 0.04; 'guido': 0.05; 'expressions': 0.07; 'generators': 0.09; 'pep': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'expressions,': 0.16; 'inclined': 0.16; 'iterable)': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject:Different': 0.16; 'subject:expressions': 0.16; 'subject:generator': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'url:peps': 0.16; 'eager': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'examples': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'url:dev': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'handling': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'subject:list': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'asked': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'comments': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'raised': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'detail': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'nov': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'forwarded': 0.39; 'read': 0.60; 'expression': 0.60; 'impact': 0.61; 'interested,': 0.61; 'here:': 0.62; 'soon': 0.63; 'different.': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=C2xmxEYQOiEgu0L19A086Zj/x6NFunGpXYDdkQjVLwU=; b=LhrclOFWbVJn0+qQ7ZtTa1bs/wQF7n8Ver7LXghpskDoQOWoBoQwJ9IC4dQRvyePE0 5AlpD9ao5JsyC6S5gyIDw0+s/+SiLDtUxBFBXA3eTIrd/7uBukVAs1x6xfYntDOpyMnz ofmcrEoqYRIucLKSFrAk1IUR+i/VQA7sp5tqPHJDoP5eJrinNj2PyVmELJkLIQ441v9x wAg2LarK4adggJsFZ8+ZfHxjJicQR5wrhhD4f0j7BUOOGhbBOm/nktNQsxqdSAFDuxgO ttU+gtyTaiU4wVfZXJq1diwTxPx8aRZTLhFGyH6Cknbc6WEVSCtU+/ldDXMdZZlBEwSj xHeQ==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.152.10.67 with SMTP id g3mr31922726lab.59.1416267539705; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:38:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <546a8524$0$12990$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References <545d76fe$0$12980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <546a8524$0$12990$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:38:59 -0800
Subject Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions
From Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com>
To "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc Python List <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.15964.1416267547.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 32
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1416267547 news.xs4all.nl 2919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46880
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:80988

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> The following list comprehension and generator expression are almost, but
>> not quite, the same:
>>
>> [expr for x in iterable]
>>
>> list(expr for x in iterable)
>>
>>
>> The difference is in the handling of StopIteration raised inside the expr.
> [...]
>
>
> Thanks to Roy and Wolfgang for their comments.
>
> If anyone is interested, Guido will soon be ruling on a PEP which will
> change the behaviour of generators and generator expressions, and he has
> asked for feedback. In particular, examples of code which will be broken by
> this change.
>
> Read the PEP here:
>
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0479
>
>
> If you post comments here, I will see that they get forwarded on.

I'm inclined to say that list comprehensions and generator expressions
should be different.  I don't really think they should be identical,
one being eager and one being lazy.  Why let the implementation detail
of one impact the other?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-08 12:50 +1100
  Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-11-07 23:39 -0500
  Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-11-08 22:31 +0100
  Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-11-08 23:42 +0100
  Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-18 10:30 +1100
    Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-11-17 15:38 -0800
    Re: Different behaviour in list comps and generator expressions Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-17 18:20 -0800

csiph-web