Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80866
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.franciliens.net!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone02.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'tree': 0.05; 'builtin': 0.09; 'bytes,': 0.09; 'function:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'bytearray': 0.16; 'checking,': 0.16; 'false)': 0.16; 'garrett': 0.16; 'hasattr(obj,': 0.16; 'iterated': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'iterators': 0.16; 'likewise': 0.16; 'list)': 0.16; 'rarely': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'str)': 0.16; 'str,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'input': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'bytes': 0.24; 'propose': 0.24; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'mix': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'checking': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'created': 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'returning': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'short': 0.38; 'use.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'here:': 0.62; 'times': 0.62; 'address': 0.63; 'great': 0.65; 'determine': 0.67; 'inline': 0.74; 'walk': 0.74 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: isiter builtin |
| Date | Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:04:16 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <CALW7ahx-7JqxWANNX=JpNFqc0rEghDNMa2kMNiHUYaNzR5WgPw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bd98f0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.13.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15877.1416128673.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 49 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1416128673 news.xs4all.nl 2829 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39531 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 2811845220 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 4821 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:80866 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Garrett Berg wrote:
> I have been working with python for a few years now, and two of my
> favorite features about it are iterators and duck typing. The fact that
> every iterator under the sun can be accessed with a simple for loop is one
> of the most amazing features of python.
>
> However, there are times when I want to do type checking, and the builtin
> function *isinstance* is of great use. However, this function fails to be
> satisfactory in returning whether the object is a valid iterator. The call
> hasattr(obj, '__iter__') also fails because str and bytes types both have
> that, and are rarely what you mean when you are asking if something is an
> iterator (how often have you iterated over a string?)
>
> I propose a new builtin to address this problem. I have created code for
> it here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/cloudformdesign/de9b54d30547ddd28ec4
I see no reason not to inline this short function:
> def isiter(obj, exclude=(str, bytes, bytearray)):
> '''Returns True if object is an iterator.
> Returns False for str, bytes and bytearray objects
> by default'''
> return (False if isinstance(obj, exclude)
> else True if hasattr(obj, '__iter__')
> else False)
Why not
return hasattr(obj, "__iter__") and not isinstance(obj, exclude)
> This will allow simple type checking on an input to determine whether it
> is an iterator.
You mean "iterable".
I'd like to see a few of your use-cases. I think most the time you don't mix
arbitrary iterables, so to walk a tree like
["alpha", "beta", [3, "delta", ["epsilon", "zeta"]]]
isinstance(obj, list) would be sufficient. Likewise for
["alpha", iter("abc"), ["beta", ["gamma"]]]
isinstance(obj, str) would work.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: isiter builtin Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-11-16 10:04 +0100
csiph-web