Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80675
| References | <CAPTjJmr9BbFQzEYzWgW+2Y_cB-kSaXZZQ0nK4Mr=TJf7i0dZXQ@mail.gmail.com> <20141113084725.GA97979@cskk.homeip.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-13 19:58 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15769.1415869145.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: > My view is that if there's a main (i.e. the module implements a small app > all on its own, however tiny), then the main program logic should come > first. The details follow later. Ah, I see. Makes sense. It's kinda like an executable docstring. Still not my preferred style, but makes its own sense. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 19:58 +1100
Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-11-13 08:33 -0500
Re: How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-14 00:40 +1100
csiph-web