Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80564
| Date | 2014-11-11 21:09 +0000 |
|---|---|
| From | Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> |
| References | <54626CB0.5080405@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: I love assert |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15692.1415740487.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
----- Original Message ----- > From: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> > To: python-list@python.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:08 PM > Subject: Re: I love assert > > On 11/11/2014 11:40 AM, Peter Cacioppi wrote: >> >> I get the impression that most Pythonistas aren't as habituated with > assert statements >> as I am. Is that just a misimpression on my part? If not, is there a good > reason to >> assert less with Python than other languages? >> >> As far as I can tell, Python supports assert perfectly well. When run with > the optimization >> flagging, the asserts are truly removed. >> >> I think one needs to take care with some basic assert coding - it's not > a substitute for >> unit tests, it doesn't absolve you of normal exception > responsibilities, and, most of all, >> it should be used for passive inspection and not action. But given these > guidelines, I >> still find it very useful as "active comments". > > asserts are a specialized tool, easily abused. Sounds like you are using them > exactly as intended. Would you say that assert is baaadly abused in nose?*) I never tried it, but probably all tests pass when Python is run with -O or -OO. *) Actually, I love that package. Much cleaner than unittest.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: I love assert Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-11 21:09 +0000
csiph-web