Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80488
| Date | 2014-11-10 14:29 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: A syntax question |
| References | <m3q6ae$m8p$1@news.albasani.net> <bf18w.682041$9R5.556154@fx29.am4> <CAKUKWzm6uHW1XWVF23xdF7t4y9NQj36MA-UwCpGoS8eg0ALHOQ@mail.gmail.com> <m3r600$pl$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15638.1415651228.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2014-11-10 20:08, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 10/11/2014 11:31, David Palao wrote: > >> My crystal ball is currently in for repair and is not expected > >> back in the foreseeable future. > > > > Without a crystal ball, this prediction might be not well founded. > > > > Especially in the future when sombody asks "Who the hell was he > replying to?". That might be a concern if the mail.python.org archive failed, and all usenet archives fell offline. Since the threading wasn't broken, it's a simple matter of looking at the previous message in the thread, as referenced in the appropriate headers: In-Reply-To: <bf18w.682041$9R5.556154@fx29.am4> References: <m3q6ae$m8p$1@news.albasani.net> <bf18w.682041$9R5.556154@fx29.am4> where that particular message can be found. Any competent mailer or news client should handle threading without the user even thinking about it. It might also be more of a concern if there was actual question/answer content rather than just a little throw-away humor. -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A syntax question Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2014-11-10 12:07 +0100
Re: A syntax question alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-10 11:23 +0000
Re: A syntax question David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> - 2014-11-10 12:31 +0100
Re: A syntax question Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-11-10 14:44 +0000
Re: A syntax question alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-10 14:54 +0000
Re: A syntax question alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-10 14:56 +0000
Re: A syntax question Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-11-10 19:53 -0500
Re: A syntax question alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-11 09:04 +0000
Re: A syntax question Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-11-10 16:11 +0000
Re: A syntax question Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 03:18 +1100
Re: A syntax question Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-11-10 14:48 -0500
Re: A syntax question Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-11-10 20:08 +0000
Re: A syntax question Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-11-10 14:29 -0600
Re: A syntax question Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-11-10 12:39 +0100
Re: A syntax question Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2014-11-10 09:35 -0500
Re: A syntax question Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 01:54 +1100
Re: A syntax question Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-11-10 16:10 +0100
Re: A syntax question Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2014-11-10 10:27 -0500
csiph-web