Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80253
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.franciliens.net!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!bcyclone03.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone03.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'interpreter.': 0.07; 'python3': 0.07; 'sys': 0.07; 'mixed': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'runs': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'bytecode': 0.16; 'conclusion:': 0.16; 'foo()': 0.16; 'function?': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'runtime.': 0.16; 'src': 0.16; 'subject:object': 0.16; 'subject:stuck': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'extensions': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'import': 0.22; 'separate': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'visible': 0.24; 'compiled': 0.26; 'pass': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'bunch': 0.31; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'similar': 0.36; 'so,': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'embedded': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'times': 0.62; 'act': 0.63; 'here': 0.66; 'containing': 0.69; 'saw': 0.77; 'functions:': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: Python, VIM: namespace, scope, life of a python object stuck in a << HERE |
| Date | Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:44:13 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <m3chpj$7qk$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bd9e98.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.13.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15482.1415173467.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 71 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1415173467 news.xs4all.nl 2847 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36046 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3972513786 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 4554 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:80253 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Veek M wrote:
> If i have two functions:
>
> function! foo()
> python3 << HERE
> import mylib
> pass
> HERE
>
> function! bar()
> python3 << HERE
> import mylib
> pass
> HERE
>
> The src says:
>
> 1. Python interpreter main program
> 3. Implementation of the Vim module for Python
>
> So, is the python interpreter embedded in vim AND additionally, are
> separate extensions to python provided (wrapper functions for the VIM
> API). Mixed bindings?
>
> How many times is mylib compiled to bytecode and loaded? Does each
> vimscript function get its own mylib - can I instantiate something and
> expect it to be visible in the other function? I have a bunch of leader
> (\)-functions that share similar code and act on the same buffer so I
> wanted to know if I could reuse that data-structure. How many times is the
> interpreter loaded into memory: once obviously at vim runtime.
I'm not a vim user and I only got to work something similar with Python 2.
I put
print "hello"
into mylib.py
and saw when it was printed with the following script:
function! Foo()
python << HERE
import sys
sys.path.append(".")
import mylib
HERE
endfunction
function! Bar()
python << HERE
import mylib
HERE
endfunction
:so vimscript.txt
:call Foo()
--> hello
:call Bar()
--> (nothing)
Conclusion: both functions share the same Python interpreter.
With a function containing
import os
print os.getpid()
you can also see that the Python interpreter runs in the same process as
vim.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python, VIM: namespace, scope, life of a python object stuck in a << HERE Veek M <vek.m1234@gmail.com> - 2014-11-05 12:28 +0630 Re: Python, VIM: namespace, scope, life of a python object stuck in a << HERE Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-11-05 08:44 +0100
csiph-web